
Judge
Gives NMFS 60 Days To Finalize
Oregon
Coho Listing
Northwest Fishletter
October 11, 2007
Oregon District Court
judge Garr King has upheld the July
recommendation
of federal magistrate Janice Stewart that found fault with the NOAA
Fisheries decision not to list
Oregon
coastal coho for protection
under the ESA. On Oct. 9, Judge King gave the agency 60 days to review
the coho ESU's status and make a new decision.
In her finding, Judge
Stewart agreed with environmental and fishing groups who argued that
NMFS did not use the "best, available science" when it decided
not to list the coho. The previous listing of the coho had serious
consequences for
Oregon
's timber industry, who
adopted a voluntary approach with the state for improving habitat. Since
2000, more than $10 million in federal spending has been funneled
through the Pacific Salmon Recovery Fund to pay for restoring and
improving habitat for coho and other listed species on the
Oregon
coast.
Critics of the 2006
NMFS decision
not to list argued that most of the coho stocks' big jump in numbers
came from improved ocean conditions that have boosted productivity since
1999. By 1998, the population had sagged to about 40,000 wild spawners,
but rebounded to 265,000 fish in 2002.
"This is a victory
for good science and for
Oregon
's future," said Earthjustice attorney Patti Goldman,
who argued for plaintiff fishing and environmental groups that NMFS
policymakers didn't take the advice of their own scientists, who found
fault with an ODFW analysis of the coho ESU. The policymakers had agreed
with a review by ODFW biologists who found that the coastal coho stocks
had reset themselves at lower viable levels than previously seen,
because of adverse changes to their coastal habitat after severe winters
in the 1990s.
But Goldman's argument
didn't reflect the sizable minority among NMFS scientists who supported
a non-listing decision. Fifty-six percent of votes by the NMFS
biological review team in 2003 supported the view that the coho were
likely to become endangered, principally because of the loss of
freshwater habitat. But 44 percent supported the position that
increasing spawner numbers since 2000 was enough evidence to show the
runs were resilient enough "to bounce back from years of depressed
runs."
By 2000,
Oregon
wild coastal coho spawners
had climbed to more than 230,000, from only 30,000 in 1997, after the
runs had been hammered by a combination of over-harvesting and poor
ocean conditions. For the past six years, spawning numbers have been
more than 100,000, higher than any year since 1971.
But Earthjustice made no
mention of the large increase in coastal coho numbers since the 1990s.
In an Oct. 9 press release, the group said the slight rebound in coastal
coho numbers between 2001 and 2003 had prompted the state of
Oregon
to "prematurely"
declare the ESU recovered enough to no longer need federal protection.
The following links were
mentioned in this story:
NW
Fishletter #234, July 26, 2007
NW
Fishletter #209, January 31,
2006
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those
who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for
non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more information go
to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
Source:
http://www.newsdata.com/fishletter/237/3story.html
|