Landowner Rights and Responsibilities are Back in the News
Again
By Headwaters News, 7-12-06
The rights and responsibilities of private landowners have always been
contentious in the West, harking back to the days of homesteading, when the
federal government gave away land in exchange for people settling it. The
mantra has long been: “you gave it to us; it’s ours. Now leave us alone
and let us do with it what we want.”
That idea has evolved somewhat over the years, and today’s property rights
issues may be different than yesterday’s, but the premise of “it’s
ours” remains.
The two biggest contentious property rights issues today are the effect of
energy development on private lands and spiking real estate valuations that
are sending property taxes sky high.
The federal government is working on a plan to increase transmission lines and
pipeline routes to move energy from Western states to the populated areas on
the West Coast, and many of those routes pass over and under private lands.
Landowners are increasingly worried about whether the government will use
eminent domain to force landowners off their land or at least commandeer
portions of it in order to lay gas and oil pipes or string electrical wires.
And as energy production continues to increase across the region, many
landowners are wrangling with energy companies that own the minerals under the
land and want to collect their bounty.
In Colorado, one real estate agent has grown so frustrated at the state
Legislature's failure to enact laws that better protect property owners
in split estate situations with energy and mineral companies, he is
spearheading a group that wants to put a constitutional amendment on the
November ballot that would help property owners.
John Gorman and his Colorado Land Owners for Fairness are pushing for a change
to the state constitution that calls for mineral companies to pay fair market
value for damage done by mineral development. Right now, the law requires that
companies give landowners 30 days notice that drilling will begin and urges
them to work out their own deal. If that fails, companies must pay a $2,000
bond for surface damages and a $5,000 bond for irrigated property before they
can begin drilling.
Gorman says those bonds do little to compensate landowners, which is why he is
pushing for the change.
Besides split estate and eminent domain issues, the other big issue affecting
private property across the region is property taxes. As many towns are
experiencing unprecedented growth to the real estate market, homeowners who
bought years ago are seeing their property taxes skyrocket to a point where
many can no longer afford them, and lawmakers in several states are calling
for reform, or rebates, or both.
Property tax reform has been a hot issue in Idaho, especially during the last
legislative session, but no reforms were passed. Now, reports the Twin
Falls Times-News, Idaho Gov. Jim Risch said he wants
a property-tax relief proposal in place before he calls lawmakers back for a
special session. Idaho Democratic lawmakers, though, are accusing Republican
lawmakers of working out a tax-relief plan in secret.
And at a public
meeting on property tax reform in Coeur d’Alene,
property owners told state officials they were ready for some reform, and
supported a ballot initiative that calls for a 1 percent cap on property tax
increases. State officials listened, but countered with their own need to find
a balance between relief and making sure state needs remain met.
State Rep. Bob Nonini also reminded attendees at the meeting that Idaho law
prohibits the use of initiatives to change the state’s Constitution. The
Idaho Constitution can only be changed with a two-thirds vote of both the
House and the Senate. Nonini said that since none of the property tax bills
garnered more than a 50 percent vote during the last legislative session, he
doubted that the spending cap measure would pass either.
And in Montana, reported the Bozeman Daily Chronicle yesterday, Bozeman and
other towns and cities want the state to give them the power to enact sales
tax as a means of lowering property taxes — a plan that has proven itself in
West Yellowstone — but right now, only Montana’s resort towns can levy
sales taxes.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those who
have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for
non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml