By Headwaters News, 9-18-06
"Plan" and "zone" used to be treated
as other four-letter words uttered in some parts of the West, but as waves
and waves of newcomers fill up subdivisions that are popping up all over the
region, land-use efforts are gaining ground in new areas of the West and are
being revamped in areas that have had such plans in place for decades.
The desire for suburban living that arose in the 40s and 50s has turned into
the desire for a place of one’s own, usually in exurbs.
Exurbs, those subdivisions miles away from the closest towns, were the focus
of a two-day land-use conference held last week in Idaho.
The Idaho
Statesman reports that ranchers, public officials,
conservationists, hunters and anglers at the Idaho Land-Use Summit voiced
their concerns about what is happening in rural Idaho counties.
County officials said that a state mandate on managing growth should come
with assistance for such planning efforts attached. The Statesman quotes
Adams County Commissioner Judy Ellis as saying, "We are one of four
states without technical support (offered to counties for planning), yet we
are mandated by the state to plan. There's not a full-time planner anywhere
in our county. I'm a teacher and a dairyman. I didn't come prepared to write
ordinances."
The change in the highest value use of private land from agricultural and
resource uses such as timber and mining into development is part of the
reason rural counties are being hit with an onslaught of growth issues.
And as development consumes more and more land, wildlife officials said
keeping access open to public lands is increasingly difficult. Sixty percent
of Idaho lands are public lands—and most of the best wildlife habitat is
on private lands — which makes government support of private landowners
willing to create and conserve important habitat increasingly important.
Ada County’s Blueprint for Good Growth was lauded by conference attendees
as a step in the right direction. The comprehensive land-use plan that links
growth with transportation plans cleared its first major hurdle when the
Blueprint’s policies and objectives were approved by the county, the six
city councils within the county and state and county transportation
officials. Now the blueprint moves on to actual projects and governmental
agreements on those projects.
Idaho officials need look no further than Colorado to see how various
land-use plans have played out over the past two decades of phenomenal
growth.
The Boulder
Daily Camera reports that over the past 50 years,
Colorado’s population has more than tripled; Boulder County’s population
has increased six-fold and tiny Superior which lies between Denver and
Boulder on Colo. 128 has grown from a sleepy burg of 134 to more than 13,700
today.
Boulder planners anticipate that Boulder will gain somewhere between 13,000
and 16,000 residents over the next 15 years or so, and Denver area planners
anticipate another 1.3 million residents will arrive in their area over that
time period.
That anticipation of growth has provided the impetus for The http://www.drcog.org/index.cfm?page=MetroVision2020”>Denver
Regional Council of Governments’ Metro Vision 2030 plan -- which calls for
the development of “distinct pedestrian-friendly urban and suburban
communities within a limited area," with transportation systems
including "sidewalks, bike paths, bus service, rail transit and
roads,” and it calls for, among other things, increasing the density of
housing as a means to accommodate future growth.
Boulder County has plenty of open space, thanks to ambitious efforts to help
ensure that about 65 percent of the county’s 474,000 total acres are
dedicated to open space. But those planning efforts that limited residential
growth while allowing commercial and industrial growth to continue have
fostered a commuter work force which drove sprawl outside the county.
Planners say that increasing housing density from an average of four units
per acre to 4.5 units per acre would conserve an area the size of the city
of Boulder by 2030.
At least one developer has already jumped on board the infill train of
thought for new development. The Denver
Post today reports that the Birch Street Group saw
potential in Denver’s smaller lots four years ago and began designing
homes to fit into the Mile High City’s older neighborhoods.
While Denver and other cities such as Salt Lake City have been plagued with
“McMansions”, those over-sized behemoth new homes that tower above
modest bungalows in some older neighborhoods, the Birch Street Group said it
tries to make sure the homes fit into the neighborhoods. Over the past four
years in Denver’s older neighborhoods that have been built out for
decades, the company has replaced more than 100 homes and they have 60 more
projects under development.
Montana, too, has its woes created by a new wave of growth. An Associated
Press story published in the Billings Gazette said
one of the primary concerns for Flathead County officials who are working on
a comprehensive growth plan, is how to manage growth and sustain affordable
housing.
The county’s comprehensive growth plan currently under construction calls
for “safe housing that is available, accessible and affordable for all
sectors of the population.” But the Flathead County Planning Board says
that clause needs to be strengthened. The board suggested adding density
bonuses that give developers an incentive to create affordable housing in
new subdivisions. The Board also said new consideration should be given to
trailer parks and subdivisions that allow manufactured housing.
As the Flathead County Planning Board offers trailer parks as a way to boost
affordable housing numbers, trailer parks in other states are already being
emptied out to clear the way for pricier housing. Elderly residents and
lower-income residents are already being evicted from their homes because
the owners of the trailer parks are selling out to developers.
And so the cycle continues.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those who
have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for
non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml