|







|
Become a friend of
the Klamath Bucket
Brigade
Send
Donations Here
All donations are tax
deductible
|
|
This Website is Dedicated to
Alvin Alexander Cheyne
January
10, 1921 - June 17, 2005
|
|
|

Smith,
Wyden, Hooley, DeFazio wrangle extra Klamath hearing for Newport
By Terry Dillman Of the News-Times
November 27, 2006
When the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (FERC) announced a series of public hearings
regarding the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for the
Klamath Hydroelectric Project, the list of sites excluded the Oregon
coast's top fishing communities, Newport in particular.
In an Oct. 26 letter to FERC Chairman Joseph T. Kelliher, United
States senators Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and Gordon Smith (R-Ore.) asked
for a hearing on the Oregon coast, preferably in Newport, the
state's largest salmon trolling port.
The additional hearing, they noted, “would provide the greatest
number of Oregon's salmon fishermen an opportunity to be heard
regarding an issues which affects the economy and culture of our
coast.” The letter said management of the Klamath River for weak
stock and Endangered Species Act-listed fish species “has
negatively affected the livelihoods of fishermen, farmers, and
tribes,” and holding hearings in location accessible to all
affected stakeholders “would be of benefit to our constituents.”
U.S. representatives
Darlene Hooley (D-5th District) and Pete DeFazio (D-4th District)
also requested an extra hearing.
FERC officials responded by scheduling a hearing for Thursday, Nov.
30 from 7 to 10 p.m. at the Newport Shilo Inn.
“The commission staff looks forward to hearing from Oregon salmon
fishermen and others regarding an issue that affects the economy and
culture of the Oregon coast,” Kelliher stated in a Nov. 15 letter
to Smith.
The DEIS evaluates the environmental consequences of issuing a new
license for the continued operation and maintenance of the Klamath
Hydroelectric Project located mainly on the Klamath River in Klamath
County, and Siskiyou County, Calif. The existing project covers 219
acres of land administered by the U.S. Bureaus of Land Management
and Reclamation. The DEIS focuses on several alternatives, including
a no-action option.
FERC has already held public sessions in Klamath Falls, and Yreka
and Eureka, Calif. The next is scheduled for Nov. 29 in North Bend,
followed by the Nov. 30 Newport meeting at the Shilo Inn, 536 SW
Elizabeth Street.
Portland-based environmental consultant Jim McCarthy encourages
anyone who can to attend the Newport session to show support for
salmon-friendly management in the Klamath River.
“These small, outdated dams provide little power, but block
hundreds of miles of former salmon habitat, and create river
conditions hostile to salmon downstream,” McCarthy noted. “The
dam reservoirs provide no flood control, have miniscule water
storage, and serve no irrigation purpose. FERC has ignored mandates
from NOAA Fisheries and other agencies to either remove the lower
four dams, or provide full fish passage to restore salmon to the
river above the dams.”
While the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Ådministration and
Pacific Fisheries Management Council “are doing the right thing
for the fish,” McCarthy wants to show “real support” for
pro-salmon polices in Oregon's coastal communities. He and others
believe fishermen are unfairly “paying the price” for the havoc
PacifiCorp's dams wreak on salmon. FERC, they say, must fully
consider those negative impacts of the lower four dams on ocean
fisheries and downstream fishing communities. They urge FERC to
consider options - chief among them, dam removal or full fish
passage - that would achieve the greatest benefit for salmon and
fishing communities.
FERC officials have estimated the cost of removing all four dams
(Iron Gate, Copco I, Copco II, and JC Boyle) at $77 million, while
adding fish passage facilities under National Marine Fisheries
Service requirements could exceed $220 million.
Terry Dillman is a reporter for the News-Times. He can be reached at
265-8571 ext. 225, or terrydillman@newportnewstimes.com.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any
copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or payment to
those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this information
for non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more information
go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
|