The Nature Conservancy,
World Wildlife Foundation, Stanford University Launch the Natural
Capital Project: Project to Revolutionize Ecosystem Management
Practices Worldwide
October 31, 2006
To: National Desk, Environment Reporter
Contact: Steven Ertel of The
Nature Conservancy, sertel@tnc.org
or 703-841-2652, or Tom Lalley of World
Wildlife Fund, tom.lalley@wwfus.org or
202-778-9544
Washington, D.C. /U.S. Newswire/ - The
Nature Conservancy, World Wildlife Foundation (WWF)
and Stanford University today announced the launch of an innovative partnership
that aims to change the way governments and policy makers think
about nature worldwide.
The program, called the Natural Capital
Project http://environment.stanford.edu/ideas/ncp.html
is an unprecedented effort to calculate the economic and other
benefits nature provides to people -- so-called "ecosystem
services" such as clean water, flood control
and climate regulation.
By answering the question, "What
is nature worth to people?" the Natural
Capital Project highlights the many ways in which
the world's forests, grasslands, arid lands, freshwater systems and
oceans, support their daily lives.
"This exciting
project brings together the expertise of leading field
conservationists and a world-class university,"
said Steve McCormick smccormick@tnc.org or
703-841-5300, president and CEO of The
Nature Conservancy. "Recognizing
that ecosystems should be protected for their intrinsic values as
well as their economic values will help us prioritize the
conservation of the world's natural systems. This, in turn, can help
improve the quality of life for people throughout the world."
Ecosystem services
can include everything from soil fertility to clean air to
pest control. These services are essential to human
health. As the world's
natural resources are depleted through unsustainable land-use
practices, important ecosystem services are being lost at an
alarming rate. The impact is greatest felt by the
world's poorest people, who cannot afford to buy or replace the
resources they are losing from nature.
Two groundbreaking scientific papers, authored by
scientists from Natural Capital Project partner
organizations, were published in PLoS (Public
Library of Science) Biology today. http://biology.plosjournals.org/perlserv/?request=index-html&issn=1545-7885
These papers are the first to show how ecosystem
services can influence the outcomes of
conservation planning
efforts.
Research led by Kai Chan kaichan@ires.ubc.ca
or 604-822-0400 at [the] University of British Columbia
and Rebecca Shaw http://www.switzernetwork.org/dirdetails.taf?id=368 rshaw@tnc.org
or 415-281-0480 of The Nature
Conservancy suggests that, in California, biodiversity
conservation is highly compatible with the
protection of ecosystem services upon which
Californians depend and should be included in systematic
conservation planning.
And research led by Robin Naidoo at WWF (The
World Wildlife Fund) revealed
that -- based on a study of a landscape in Paraguay -- the
economic benefits of conserving forests exceed the benefits of
farming the same land in many areas.
Chan's paper can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0040379
and Naidoo's paper can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0040360.
"Learning to map the
economic values of nature will give us the information we
need to conserve ecosystems for the benefit of biodiversity and
people. That's what these papers and the Natural Capital Project,
are about," said Taylor Ricketts, director of WWF's Conservation
Science Program and co-author of one of the papers.
"Our early results indicate that
the benefits of conservation can far outweigh costs and that if land
owners could capture the value of ecosystem services, like carbon
storage, conservation can be a profitable use of land."
The Natural Capital
Project will begin
working with local partners in three pilot
areas -- the Eastern Arc Mountains of Tanzania http://www.naturalcapitalproject.org/tanzania.html, the
upper Yangtze River Basin in China http://www.naturalcapitalproject.org/china_prim.html and
the Sierra Nevada region in California http://www.naturalcapitalproject.org/california.html
-- to assess the value of the ecosystem
services and to then help incorporate those
values into policies and resource decisions.
-----
The Nature
Conservancy is a leading international, nonprofit
organization that preserves
plants, animals and natural communities representing the diversity
of life on Earth by protecting the lands and waters they need to
survive. To date, the Conservancy and its more
than one million members have been responsible for the
protection of more than 15 million acres in
the United States and have helped preserve more
than 102 million acres in Latin America, the Caribbean, Asia and the
Pacific. Visit them on the Web at http://www.nature.org.
-----
World Wildlife Fund
is the largest conservation
organization in the world. For 45 years, WWF
has worked to save endangered species, protect endangered habitats
and address global threats such as deforestation, over fishing and
climate change. Known worldwide by its panda logo,
WWF works in 100 countries on more than 2,000 conservation
programs. WWF has 1.2
million members in the United States and nearly 5 million supporters
worldwide. For more information on WWF, visit http://www.worldwildlife.org.
http://www.usnewswire.com
Copyright 2006, usnewswire.com.
http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=75352
Related
reading/information:
Natural Capital Project
About
Governments, businesses and other organizations
routinely use cost-benefit analyses to select among policy
alternatives and identify worthy investments. Unfortunately for the
biosphere and the humans who rely on it, these cost-benefit analyses
rarely reflect natural capital, or the living and non-living
resources of nature on which humans intimately depend. Natural
capital includes forests, wetlands, coral reefs, and grasslands,
from which flow a stead stream of economically-valuable “ecosystem
services”.
Ecosystem Services: The conditions and
processes through which ecosystems, and the species that make them
up, sustain and fulfill human life. Examples include production of
goods (seafood, crops, and timber); life-support benefits (clean
water, climate stability, flood control, pollination);
life-fulfilling benefits (aesthetic and other cultural inspiration);
and preservation of options.
Unlike financial or social capital, natural
capital tends to be undervalued, not well known, and degraded
rapidly, causing significant harm to ecosystem services (Millennium
Assessment, 2005). If we do not
aptly value ecosystem services, we will bankrupt our natural assets
and end up doing more harm than good, in spite of the best of
intentions.
http://www.naturalcapitalproject.org/about.html
Toolbox
The Natural Capital Project is developing a suite
of tools that will allow practitioners and decision makers to
identify projects or decisions that could benefit from an ecosystem
services approach, and then support design of policy instruments or
financial mechanisms that contribute to more equitable and
profitable decisions that align biodiversity conservation and human
well-being.
Modeling and Mapping Ecosystem Services
We are currently developing a practical software
system to serve these needs, with a focus on carbon storage,
hydrological services (water quantity, quality, timing of flows),
and biodiversity. The package consists of several modules that allow
the user to develop scenarios to represent possible futures that may
arise from a decision (Scenario Module and Policy and Finance
Module), visualize and quantify ecosystem processes under different
future scenarios (Biophysical Module), consider economic and social
conditions to quantify the market and non-market values of ecosystem
processes in each scenario (Valuation Module) and analyze social,
economic and environmental differences between scenarios to identify
trade-offs and synergies among all sectors.
http://www.naturalcapitalproject.org/toolbox.html
http://www.naturalcapitalproject.org/california.html
http://www.naturalcapitalproject.org/china_prim.html
http://www.naturalcapitalproject.org/tanzania.html
http://environment.stanford.edu/ideas/ncp.html
http://www.conservationbiology.org/jobs/detail.cfm?id=7446
Rebecca Shaw,
Director of Conservation Science and Planning, The Nature
Conservancy
201 Mission Street, 4th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105
Rebecca Shaw is the Director of Conservation
Science for The Nature Conservancy in San Francisco and Visiting
Scientist at the Carnegie Institution’s Department of Global
Ecology on Stanford University’s campus. As Director of
Conservation Science, she is responsible for incorporating the best
available scientific information into the full array of TNC programs
and managing an interdisciplinary team of scientific and technical
experts. Through partnerships with academics and government agency
partners, her team’s research projects focus on incorporating
climate change impacts and economic return into conservation
priority setting and conservation planning for ecosystem services,
marine systems and migratory species. Prior to joining TNC, Rebecca
conducted research at the Department of Global Ecology on the
impacts of global change on ecosystems processes and biodiversity.
The results of her research have been published in leading academic
journals including Science and Nature. She received her M.A. in
environmental policy and her PhD in energy and resources from the
University of California at Berkeley.
Keywords: ecosystem ecology, environmental
education, population, environmental policy, community political
activism
http://www.switzernetwork.org/dirdetails.taf?id=368
Kai Chan
I am an assistant professor in the Institute for
Resources, Environment and Sustainability at University of British
Columbia. I do research in two main areas: the ecological and
evolutionary underpinnings of ecosystem resistance to invasions and
infestations, and conservation planning for ecosystem services.
Invasive species and population outbreaks of native species cost
society dearly, and devastate ecosystems. Yet we know relatively
little about how we can guard against these disruptions pre-emptively,
bolstering the critical ecosystem service of infestation resistance.
In general, we need to do a far better job of planning for ecosystem
services, which are so critical for sustaining and fulfilling human
life. If you're a prospective student, please see my projects at my IRES
page.
I was recently a postdoctoral fellow with Gretchen
Daily and Paul
Ehrlich at the Center for Conservation
Biology (CCB)
at Stanford University. My research there had two major components:
countryside biogeography (the study of biodiversity in
human-dominated landscapes) and conservation planning/finance (the
design of conservation tools). I was a Ph.D. student under Simon
Levin at Princeton University, where I
studied the process of diversification, and collaborated with Brian
Moore. I was also a policy fellow, and did
ethics research with Peter
Singer.
Our responsibilities to current and future persons
and the natural world call for us all to be social and environmental
advocates and activists. At Princeton, I coordinated Greening
Princeton; at Stanford, I was a senior
fellow at scienceinpolicy.org (to improve the use of science in
policy); and I am a senior fellow of the Environmental
Leadership Program.
Contact Details:
Institute for Resources, Environment & Sustainability, UBC (The
University of British Columbia)
AERL, 438 - 2202 Main Mall
Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4
Canada
kaichan@ires.ubc.ca
604-822-0400
Fax: 604-822-9520
My CV
(pdf)
http://www.ires.ubc.ca/personal/kaichan/