Tribe members collect clams, seaweed to protest state
rules
By
Zach St. George
North Coast Journal
(June 23, 2011)
Rosie Clayburn pulled a yellowish razor clam
from her bag and held it up to show the tribal members gathered
around her. She wore rubber boots pulled up over her jeans, and
the sleeves of her maroon Yurok Tribe sweatshirt were wet and
flecked with sand. “I… don’t have a license,” she said
nervously.
“Good!” exclaimed Dania Rose Colegrove, also
of the Yurok Tribe.
“I just have my tribal I.D.,” Clayburn said.
Tribes up and down the North Coast hit the
beaches on Saturday morning to protest the Marine Life
Protection Act (MLPA), which they say doesn’t acknowledge their
right to traditionally gather marine life. Between 90 and 100
members of several tribes attended informal gatherings at
Patrick’s Point, Clam Beach, and Wilson Creek in Del Norte
County, said organizer Bob McConnell of the Yurok Tribe, while
some went individually to their traditional gathering grounds to
show support.
Tribal groups are using the MLPA as a rallying
point to demand that the state government leave them alone when
they harvest marine life according to their traditions. They
argue that any regulations or license rules should not apply to
them, and they want the MLPA to reflect that. They want the
state to accept their tribal identification, instead of a
fishing license or any other required documents, when they
harvest mussels, clams, seaweed and more.
The MLPA, which aims to reorganize and improve
the quality of California’s marine protected areas, was adopted
by the state legislature in 1999, but languished until 2004 when
private donations jump-started its implementation, according to
Susan Ashcraft, a senior biologist with the California
Department of Fish and Game. She said that earlier protected
areas had been arranged haphazardly, and in some cases only gave
the impression of protecting marine life. The MLPA aims to
rearrange the protected areas into a network, said Ashcraft, so
that protected, pristine webs of life will dot the entire coast
of California.
“The goal is to have intact ecosystems,” said
Ashcraft.
A team of scientists evaluated the protected
areas and made recommendations to Fish and Game, focusing
particularly on what happens when one or more species is
depleted or removed entirely. The science team developed a scale
of species, based on their relative importance in each
ecosystem. “Backbone” species such as clams, mussels and
seaweed, which provide habitat for other species, were deemed
especially important. The scientific team recommended that
harvest of those species be well-controlled and extremely
minimal, Ashcraft said.
“The science team did not consider the rate
of [harvest],” said Ashcraft, “or who is doing the taking.”
Craig Tucker, who works for the Karuk Tribe,
said that neither the Legislature nor the foundations that
helped fund the implementation of the MLPA fully considered the
demands of native groups.
Rosie Clayburn shows her trophy at Clam Beach on
Saturday. PHOTOS BY ZACH ST. GEORGE
Saturday’s event was part of a final push by
the tribes to assert their claimed rights. On June 29 and 30,
the Fish and Game Commission in Stockton will hear
recommendations on how to accommodate tribal groups in the MLPA
North Coast section, dubbed Region 4, which stretches from the
Oregon border down to Alder Point in Mendocino County. Several
options regarding native harvesting rights are currently on the
table. All would allow tribal members to gather marine resources
in state marine parks and state marine conservation areas, while
two would exempt state marine reserves. All the options would
also allow recreational harvest by non-natives, and would still
require that tribal members buy a license.
Ashcraft said that even if the Department of
Fish and Game wanted to allow the tribes to harvest without a
license, state law prohibits giving individuals or groups
exclusive rights to harvest.
McConnell said that is unacceptable. “We are
not just like the rest of the citizens of California,” McConnell
said. “We are members of a sovereign nation. We have inherent
rights to do this and we want them recognized.”
Being allowed to gather, and gathering by
right are not the same, he said. “We don’t want to be lumped in
with recreational users. We are different than recreational
users.”
To underscore that point, on Saturday a group
of around 20 tribal members and their non-native supporters
started the morning at Patrick’s Point State Park. They gathered
baskets of seaweed, which isn’t allowed in state parks, and they
didn’t pay for admission to the park.
As she walked along the trails overlooking the
water, Karuk Tribe member Kathy Barger stopped frequently to
point out different plants. “This one is used to make baskets. …
You can wrap your salmon in this. … This one is used to make
dye.” Barger came all the way from Happy Camp in Siskiyou County
to show her support. “It’s our tradition,” she said. “The
ability to gather food has always been our right. Now we’re
being forced to buy our food in the store.”
Patrick’s Point, Clam Beach and Wilson Creek
are not and won’t become protected areas. The protesters chose
those sites to make the point that they believe they are
entitled to gather marine life anywhere along the coast,
regardless of government restrictions, McConnell said.
From Patrick’s Point, the group headed to Clam
Beach. Their quiet defiance probably went unnoticed by the
crowds of recreational clam diggers. Clayburn, with her handful
of clams, was the only one of the group that had any success.
She said that she digs frequently — Saturday was her fifth time
clam digging that week — and she said she doesn’t typically
carry a license. “The only time Fish and Game stopped me, they
just measured the clams,” she said.
Fish and Game was aware of the protest, but
did not ask any of the people involved for their fishing
licenses, according to department spokeswoman Jordan Traverso.
She said that hundreds of clam diggers were out at one of the
sites on Saturday, and enforcement officials would not have
routinely demanded licenses from all of them.
The conflict between Fish and Game and native
people is often more dramatic, said Colegrove. She has run into
trouble for deer hunting without a license. “I’ve been caught
for poaching six times,” she said. “This is nothing new to me.”
The last time she got caught, she said, her guns were
confiscated and she was forced to pay more than $3,000 in fines.
She doesn’t see subsistence hunting or gathering as poaching,
and said she isn’t likely to stop any time soon. “I’m getting
food,” Colegrove said.
The bottom line, according to Yurok Tribe
member Frankie Jo Myers, is that the tribes see the MLPA because
it is the latest in a series of actions by the state of
California that assert control over the native people who live
here.
“We’re never going to stop harvesting,
regardless of what they say,” Myers said. Native people believe
that nature is not nature without humans. “Because we love the
natural system, we have to stay a part of it.”