The governor and two other top Oregon officials meet in Salem today to
decide whether the land underneath a 174-mile section of the John Day River is
public property. Years in the making, the State Land Board's decision follows numerous
confrontations between river users and landowners along the Central Oregon
river. In recent months, a larger battle has eclipsed the dispute over the John
Day and could affect public use and private property on nearly every river and
stream in Oregon. The debate focuses on a bill before the Legislature that scored some
high-profile support last week. In a letter to the Land Board, Senate
Republican and Democratic leaders, as well as the leadership in the
Republican-controlled House, pledged to pass Senate Bill 1028 by the end of
the current session. The bill's continued support among lawmakers is notable considering its
lack of public backing: At committee hearings, next to no one has spoken in
its favor, and both river users and riverside property owners have opposed it
-- though for different reasons. "This is the bill everybody seems to love to hate," said Senate
Minority Leader Ted Ferrioli, R-John Day, who along with Senate Majority
Leader Kate Brown, D-Portland, is sponsoring the bill. "We anticipated that people who had vested interest in the status quo
would not particularly appreciate this," Ferrioli said. The heart of the bill is a portion that says the public can use "any
segment of a free-flowing, floatable, natural waterway" for recreation
such as fishing or boating, a definition that would apply to most rivers in
the state. It then specifies that recreational use can be "conditioned, limited,
restricted or excluded" by a statewide management plan. The bill also
sets up a committee of landowners, river users, tribes, and law enforcement
and government officials to advise the state on river management. New fees and licenses Those provisions, along with new fees and licenses for nonmotorized boats
such as canoes, have galvanized opposition among river users. They see the
bill as limiting rights they already have, and they point to an opinion from
Attorney General Hardy Myers in April that says the public has a right to use
any river large enough to float a boat, regardless of who owns the beds and
banks. "This bill, instead of following the law and providing for public
access, it seeks to cut them off in some places," said Eric Leaper,
executive director of the National Organization for Rivers. The group is
following the debate here and a similar one in Colorado. At the same time, landowners fear the bill would expand public use of
rivers, thereby bringing more boaters -- and their trash -- to their homes and
farms. "Our concern is that the bill is giving access to the beds and banks
of private property on pretty much the majority of the streams and rivers in
the state," said Katie Fast, a lobbyist for the Oregon Farm Bureau. The only statutory means in Oregon to guarantee river access is through a
"navigability" ruling by the State Land Board. That's what the board
-- the governor, secretary of state and treasurer -- will weigh today for the
John Day. Such a ruling would mean the state owns the beds and banks of the river,
ensuring public access to the waterway. But the navigability process is
cumbersome, and landowners consider a navigability finding akin to a land
grab. Governor's support unknown Gov. Ted Kulongoski and the other board members could decide to postpone
their decision on the John Day while the bill moves through the Legislature. The governor "has supported the Legislature working towards some kind
of legislation that would end the Land Board's making decisions on a
river-by-river basis," said Anna Richter Taylor, the governor's
spokeswoman. Taylor didn't say whether the governor would support the bill. It cleared
the Senate Rules Committee last month and was sent to the Senate Budget
Committee's subcommittee on natural resources last week. The state board has declared portions of two other rivers navigable.
Sections of 10 other rivers have been deemed navigable through court cases,
Oregon statehood law or legislative action from the 1870s. Matthew Preusch: 541-382-2006; preusch@bendbroadband.com Source:
John Day River status, law reviewed
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those who
have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for
non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml