






|
Become a friend of
the Klamath Bucket
Brigade
Send
Donations Here
All donations are tax
deductible
|
|
This Website is Dedicated to
Alvin Alexander Cheyne
January
10, 1921 - June 17, 2005
|

GovTrack.us is an independent tool to help the public
research and track the activities in the U.S. Congress, promoting
government transparency and civic education through novel uses of
technology.
|
|

Pacific Power seeks 20 percent hike in electricity
rates
By
Ted Sickinger, The Oregonian
March 2, 2010
Pacific Power is seeking a 20 percent increase in
electricity rates starting next January to cover major investments in
transmission and generation as well as forecasted higher power costs
next year, according to filings with the Oregon Public Utility
Commission.
The company also intends to file an additional request for a rate
increase of about 1.5 percent later this year to cover the eventual
removal of dams on the Klamath River.
Pacific Power is Oregon's second largest investor-owned utility. It's
553,000 Oregon customers are spread in pockets throughout the state,
from the coast to Portland, and from Enterprise and Bend to Klamath
Falls and Medford. Its territory includes some of the areas in Oregon
hardest hit by the recession.
The new requests come on top of rate increases earlier this year that
added about 5 percent to customers bills. They also come as the state's
largest electric utility, Portland General Electric Co., has filed a
request for a 7.4 percent rate increase.
Pacific Power's request is "a whopper," said Bob Jenks, executive
director of Citizen's Utility Board of Oregon, a ratepayer advocacy
group. "In the economy we're in today, where many of their customers are
struggling to pay their bills, this is going to be really difficult for
folks.
Industrial customer advocates said they were astonished by the size of
the rate increase and the fact that the company wasn't staggering some
of its capital investments to alleviate the resulting rate shock.
Company officials acknowledged that it's a terrible time for rate
increases, but said the investments were in many cases being driven by
state and local mandates for more renewable power and pollution
controls.
"We understand the timing is horrible with so many facing ongoing
economic distress, but these are good long-term investments that we're
making on behalf of our customers," said Jan Mitchell, a company
spokeswoman.
The company told regulators it needs a 13.1 percent general rate
increase to recover the costs of new transmission lines, two wind farms
in Wyoming and pollution control equipment at a coal plant. The company
is also requesting an increase in its allowed profit margin. The overall
capital investment exceeds $2 billion across its six-state system, more
than half of it for new wind farms and transmission capacity. The share
of those investments allocated to Oregon customers is about $470
million.
In a separate filing, the company is also forecasting a 7 percent
increase in power costs, an expense that is passed through to customers.
While wholesale power prices have been low, the company says it is
facing the expiration of long-term contracts for low-priced hydropower,
the expiration of a fixed-price gas contract, and costs associated with
integrating intermittent wind power.
Overall, the company said an average residential customer using 900
kilowatt hours of electricity would see their monthly bill increase from
$80.96 to $96.78 in 2011. The power cost portion of that monthly
increase, $4.81, is subject to change based on what happens in wholesale
power markets later this year.
Regulators will examine the specific elements of the rate requests over
the next nine months to determine what increase is justified.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any
copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those
who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for
non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
|