
Tribal
land plan clouds dam deal
A
proposal to restore Klamath reservation territory threatens an agreement
for setting free the Klamath River
January 20, 2008
MATTHEW
PREUSCH
The
Oregonian
KLAMATH FALLS
-- The Klamath Tribes'
proposal to rebuild its lost reservation with federal money is stirring
old animosities here and threatening to upset a hard-fought agreement to
tear down four
Klamath River
dams.
The so-called settlement
group of 26 government agencies, farmers, tribes, fishermen and
conservationists Tuesday announced a proposal to bring competing
interests together to remove the dams.
The dams, owned by
Portland-based PacifiCorp, have no fish ladders on the lowest three and
are widely blamed for destroying salmon runs in the river and in the
Pacific Ocean
.
In the proposal to remove
the dams are sweeteners for various interest groups to get them to
cooperate. They range from guaranteed irrigation water for farmers to
money for Native American tribes.
Under the new strategy,
the agreement supports the tribes' request for $21 million from Congress
over the next four years to buy 90,000 acres of private forestland. That
amounts to about 2 percent of the $1 billion estimated cost of the
Klamath
Basin
settlement.
The only reference in the
241-page settlement proposal to re-establishing the reservation is
Section 35.2 on Page 138, a brief mention of what it calls the Mazama
Project.
Restoring the reservation
is a hot-button issue in
Klamath
County
. With each new struggle in the basin, where farms go back
generations and tribal lore to time immemorial, each new argument
recalls past prejudices.
The tribal land proposal
is no different.
On a frigid Thursday
night, about 50 people stood outside the
Klamath
County
courthouse on
Main Street
holding placards protesting
the tribes' land deal and other portions of the agreement. At a
three-hour meeting of the county's Natural Resource Advisory Committee
that followed, Edward Bartell of the Klamath Off-Project Water Users
Association urged the committee to reject the settlement.
"The way this has
worked out is you stab everyone in the back and the last one standing
has a settlement," Bartell said.
The land in question is a
25-mile-long wedge of lodgepole and ponderosa pine straddling U.S. 97
north of
Klamath Falls
and covering the northwest
corner of the tribes' former reservation.
More than 50 years ago
under a federal policy called termination, members of the Klamath Tribes
got cash payments and their reservation was converted into the
Fremont-Winema
National Forest
. Many of the 3,500 tribal
members today contend they were swindled, but others in the basin say
the Native Americans got a fair price and aren't entitled to federal
money to help them recover their lost land.
The tribes recently
shelved a push to revert 690,000 acres of the national forest to tribal
ownership. The plan was opposed by a local group worried about losing
access to public lands as well as national environmental groups that
feared stepped up logging in the pine lands.
Some of the same voices
that fought the return of the national forest to tribal ownership now
speak out against the Mazama forest purchase.
"They sold it and
now we're going to buy it and give it back to them?" said Glenn
Howard of the Klamath Basin Alliance, a group of private landowners.
The parcel contemplated
for the reservation is part of 500,000 acres of Northwest timberland
broken up after Crown Pacific declared bankruptcy in 2003. It also
includes a shutdown stud mill the tribes hope to use.
"We're trying to
find a valuation that works for both sides, as we'd really like to see
the tribes have this property," said Greg Lane, chief operating
officer of Fidelity National Timber Resources, a subsidiary of
Florida-based Fidelity National Financial, which purchased controlling
interest in Crown's former holdings in 2006.
The tribes see the forest
property as a cornerstone to reconstituting its resource-based economy
and helping ensure eventual tribal self-sufficiency.
"We want to get as
much of the reservation as we possibly can, and use it obviously for
tribal members but also the community," tribal Chairman Joseph Kirk
said in an interview.
The agreement also
envisions fulfilling the tribes' desire to restore salmon runs to
tributaries of
Upper Klamath Lake
.
In return, farmers who
are part of the federal Klamath Project will get predictable allocations
of water during irrigation season, forestalling, they hope, a basinwide
crisis like the one that erupted in 2001. And the tribes promise to back
off on using the Endangered Species Act as a weapon against irrigators.
But before any part of
the agreement can be enacted it must be approved by the tribes,
Klamath
County
commissioners and others.
Perhaps most dauntingly the deal is contingent on PacifiCorp agreeing to
decommission its four hydroelectric dams on the
lower Klamath
River
. The Portland-based utility
was not party to the agreement and hasn't said whether it will go along.
Now there are worries the
attempt to get a new reservation could destroy more than two years of
tense negotiations.
"It took 21/2 years
to build this, and it seems like we're trying to tear it down in 48
hours," said Greg Addington, executive director of the Klamath
Water Users Association, which represents irrigators on the 240,000-acre
federal Klamath Project in southern
Oregon
and northern
California
.
Matthew Preusch:
541-382-2006; preusch@bendbroadband.com
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those
who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for
non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more information go
to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
Source:
http://www.oregonlive.com/news/oregonian/index.ssf?/base/
news/1200716707296330.xml&coll=7
|