Contact: Dawn Collier
Phone: (916) 419-7111
Sacramento,CA; September 20, 2005: The
United States Fish and Wildlife Service has agreed to perform status reviews
for all 194 California species that Pacific Legal Foundation filed
suit earlier this year to compel. Although the Endangered Species Act
requires that the government review the status of listed species every five
years, the Fish and Wildlife Service has failed to perform the reviews for
about two-thirds of California’s listed species. A federal court approved a
settlement between the Fish and Wildlife Service and PLF this morning.
Under the terms of the agreement,
the Fish and Wildlife Service agreed to perform all of the reviews over the
next eight years, with the first wave of reviews beginning by the end of this
month. The agency agreed to prioritize the species reviews according to how
much is known about the species in question and how onerous their listing has
been for California property owners and businesses.
"The government has recognized that there is no justification for failing
to comply with the law. This settlement allows the Fish and Wildlife Service
the time to do a thorough analysis of each species, and make sure that
taxpayer dollars are only being spent on species that truly need
protecting," said Pacific Legal Foundation Principal Attorney Rob
Rivett.
"When federal regulation is restricting land use, raising home prices,
and killing jobs, the government owes it to Californians to do the work
necessary to determine if those regulations are actually necessary," said
Rivett. "We expect this effort will allow Californians to get back to
work building the schools and homes they need that have been mired in gridlock
because of outdated listings."
Under Section 4(c)(2) of the Endangered Species Act, 16 U.S.C. Section
1533(c)(2), the Fish and Wildlife Service must perform status reviews of
listed species every five years to determine whether, based on current best
available science, each listed species should have its status changed (i.e.,
either lowered from endangered to threatened or raised from threatened to
endangered), or have its status as a listed species removed because protection
is no longer justified.
Because the service has failed to perform the reviews for 194 of
California’s 298 listed species, the agency has no way of knowing if the
government is wasting millions of taxpayer dollars on species that no longer
need protection or forcing burdensome and costly land use restrictions on
Californians unnecessarily. The high cost of complying with land use
regulations to protect species raises the cost of everything from homes to
food in California, and significantly impacts the state’s economy.
The plaintiffs in the case are the California State Grange, the California
Cattlemen’s Association, and the California Forestry Association.
Click here
for a copy of the settlement, including a list of species and the timeline for
the five-year reviews.
About Pacific Legal Foundation
Pacific Legal Foundation is the nation’s oldest and largest public interest
legal organization dedicated to defending private property rights. PLF is a
national leader in the effort to reform the Endangered Species Act and raise
awareness of the Act’s impact on people. PLF’s headquarters are in
Sacramento, California.
T
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those who
have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for
non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
Source: http://www.pacificlegal.org/view_PLFNews.asp?iID=298&sTitle=
Fish+and+Wildlife+Service+Agrees+to+Perform+Status+Reviews+for+194+Species+in+California