Another dry year
Pioneer Press
Fort Jones, CA
Wednesday, February 4,
2009
page 1, col 1
It's looking like another
dry year is coming.
The California Department of
Water Resources recently
released a report showing
the Sierra snowpack's water
content at 61 percent of
normal.
Meanwhile, the snow water
content in the Siskiyou
mountain range - the range
that separates Oregon from
California -- was only 46
percent of normal in the
four snow survey sites
measured last Thursday by
snow ranger Steve Johnson in
the Siskiyou Mountains
Ranger District of the Rogue
River-Siskiyou National
Forest.
Governor Arnold
Schwarzenegger last Thursday
announced that "California
is entering a third straight
year of drought" and said
the snow survey is just one
more piece of evidence that
California needs
comprehensive water reform
to protect the economy,
jobs, communities and
quality of life.
Hardest hit this summer will
likely be the Sacramento-San
Joaquin Delta. Statewide
precipitation to date is at
only 70 percent of normal
statewide, threatening
another dry year, while
unseasonably warm and dry
conditions are rapidly
eroding the snowpack. Some
argue the dry weather will
give the governor the
leverage needed to push the
infamous peripheral canal -
that giant water project
that would move water north
of the delta to users down
south - that was voted down
by California voters in
1982. A coalition of
environmentalists,
commercial fishermen,
recreational anglers, Delta
farmers and California
Indian Tribes is strongly
opposing the canal because
it would create the
infrastructure to export
even more water out of the
California Delta. Last July,
the Governor and Senator
Dianne Feinstein proposed a
"compromise" plan to the
Legislature to build a
peripheral canal and more
dams.
However, canal opponents say
the Schwarzenegger/Feinstein
plan would destroy rather
than restore collapsing
populations of chinook
salmon, steelhead, delta
smelt, longfin smelt,
striped bass, threadfin
shad, American shad and
Sacramento splittail by
diverting badly needed
freshwater flows from the
Sacramento River to
subsidized agribusiness on
the San Joaquin Valley's
west side. The canal/dams
plan would also be
expensive, costing an
estimated $12 to $24 billion
at a time when the state of
California is in severe
financial crisis.