By Lance Waldren
Pioneer Press Staff Writer
Klamath County - "Our ranch is now bordered on three sides by
Measure 37 claims," said Scott Balin, who is a third generation
rancher in the area. If these claims go through, this productive farm
ground will be turned into two acre home sites.
"I need to stand up for the right to farm and ranch," Balin
said.
Balin Ranches began raising cattle, potatoes and alfalfa hay in the
early 1940s on the ranch just south of Klamath Falls.
"Under Measure 37 it will be harder for young guys trying to get
started in farming and for them to expand," Balin said.
It has always been when older farmers wanted to retire they would
lease their land to younger guys or sell the property to neighbors.
Balin said he understands that a lot of these smaller farms are having
a hard time making a living and are looking to retire. But he feels
many of them have been deceived and manipulated by land use lawyers
and large property developers who have been knocking on doors in the
area.
"The lawyers and developers are the ones out pushing this because
they are the ones who will profit from the land being developed."
said Balin.
Under Measure 37, if government enacts a regulation that lowers the
value of private property, the landowner has the right to either to be
compensated for the loss or exempted from the legislation.
A landowner can file a claim over regulations passed many years ago,
provided the owner has held title to his property since before the
regulation was passed. In other words, if you owned your property
prior to 1973, when they passed the first zoning regulations, you can
apply for a Measure 37 waiver which exempts you from any zoning laws.
So far, statewide there have been 6,749 claims affecting 566,952
acres. In Klamath County alone, there are currently 179 claims
representing 21,248 acres.
Supporters of the measure promoted it as a way for small landowners to
sell off lots to support themselves in retirement or to build houses
for their children on family property.
The reality of the situation is that individuals and large
corporations have filed thousands of claims, seeking waivers which
could open thousands of acres of rural farm and forest land to
residential development, or seeking payments into the millions of
dollars.
"This is a lot of crying wolf, you are not going to see the huge
subdivisions in our area," said Mike Spencer, a local lawyer
specializing in Measure 37. "It is a question of fairness, it
returns your rights back to what you could have done when you bought
the property."
Spencer said if "for the good of everyone," the state
decides they do not want to let you build on your property that is
fine as long as they compensate you for the loss.
Mary Liz Bunch, Klamath County Planning Department, works on nothing
but Measure 37 claims for the county. According to Bunch, there have
been so many claims that have come in that "The State is in a
state of crisis." The government has 180 days from the time a
claim is filed, to deal with it, or the person filing the claim can
file for compensation in court.
According to Bunch, even though a waiver for a certain piece of ground
has been issued, it does not necessarily mean the landowner can do
whatever they want. They still must meet all health and safety
regulations regarding new construction. This means water and septic
regulations apply as well as other regulations such as for streets and
roadways.
Another aspect of Measure 37 that must be looked at, is that it has
created new property rights victims. If you purchased your property
because you knew the surrounding property could not be developed and
then along comes Measure 37, you are now living next to a subdivision
and the value of your property has been devalued.
There are too many holes in this legislation. It has created ad hoc
development and chaos in the government and rural community.
According to Bunch, the states of Washington, Nevada,
Montana, Idaho and California all had measures similar to Measure 37
recently on the ballots. They looked at what was happening in Oregon
and these measures were defeated.
"Whether you are for or against Measure 37, We as a nation need
to worry about what we are leaving for our kids," said Bunch.
(Permission to post from the publisher.)