In his May budget proposal, the governor recommended eliminating $39
million that the state provides to local governments participating in
the highly successful conservation program. For Siskiyou County this
would mean a loss of approximately $770,000 in revenues in the next
fiscal year.
"The Williamson Act has proven to be one of the most significant
conservation programs in state history," stated Barry Shioshita,
Siskiyou County Administrator. "To eliminate a component of the
program, which would make it fiscally impossible for many counties to
continue participation, is not sound public policy."
The Act calls for a voluntary contract between a property owner and
local government. In return for agreeing not to develop the land for a
minimum of 10 years, the property owner receives a tax break. The
state then reimburses participating local governments with a portion
of the property tax revnue they would receive if the land was not part
of the program.
Since its inception in the mid-19860s, the Williamson Act has been
highly successful. More than 16.5 million acres of farm and ranch
land, including nearly six million acres of California's prime
farmland, are enrolled in this program. In Siskiyou County, there are
409,761 acres currently enrolled in the Williamson Act, 90,622 acres
of this is prime farmland.
"Siskiyou County is proud to be part of the
Williamson Act program. Farmland preservation and open space
conservation, though, should be a statewide priority, not just a local
priority. We need to ensure that the Williamson Act is not altered. If
the state removes its fiscal responsibility to the program, it will be
turning its back on 40 years of environmental and agricultural
protection," stated Mike Mallory, Siskiyou County Assessor.
While the $39 million in subventions is a critical funding component
for local government, it only amounts to a mere .036 of one percent of
the proposed state budget.
"With flat property tax revenues, Siskiyou County is not in a
position to backfill the revenues loss if the Williamson Act program
is altered. This would necessitate cuts in other program areas, such
as public safety, health or other general government services,"
CAO Shioshita noted. "These are programs that are vital to our
residents; we do not want to be put into a position of 'either/or' by
the state."
(Permission to post from the publisher.)