Water rights have been one of the most controversial issues
in the western sector of our nation for decades, but up
until the Spring of 2001, most living in that part of the
country paid very little attention to this liquid that is so
essential to life flowing off the high mountain peaks.
Due to the lack of snow fall in the higher elevations
surrounding the Klamath Basin in central Oregon, water
levels in Klamath Lake were extremely low. Environmentalist,
Tribal Indian groups in the basin and along the Klamath
River and it's tributaries, and many involved in the fishing
industries along the coastlines of the Pacific filed a
lawsuit to preserve water flows in the river that would
accommodate fishery habitat and fishery migrations to the
ocean. The legal actions filed by these groups was embraced
by the Endangered Species Act (EPA) passed in 1978, which
has a tendency to place the welfare of fishery, wildlife and
plant life over welfare concerns of our nation's citizens.
Federal courts ruled that the water would be dispersed in
the sole interests of accommodating the needs of the
fisheries, resulting in ordering federal regulators to shut
off irrigation water to several hundred growers in the
Basin. The aftermath of the devastating effects of the
courts decisions not only forced many landholders and
businesses in the area into bankruptcy, but also had long
reaching negative effects in the local and state economies.
Eight years later, the EPA was the instigating force in
another lawsuit that reeked devastation in one of the most
fertile agriculture areas of the world - the San Joaquin
Valley. Federal agents shut down the pumping of water to
more than a million acres of farmland and 25 million
Californians in the Spring of 2009. Once again, the fishing
industry and environmentalists found a species to
accommodate the needs for their agenda - the Delta Smelt.
This minnow, that will fit in the palm of a hand, was
getting caught in irrigation pumps and because of it's
endangered status (under the guidelines of the EPA), farm
lands became nothing more than an arid desert, resulting in
the devastation of a thriving local economy and loss of an
abundance of marketable produce throughout the nation.
A recent ruling by U.S. District Judge Oliver W. Wagner made
a landmark decision earlier this month that cripples the
concept that the welfare of the species and plant life
supersedes that of mankind. The justice ruled that federal
water officials must consider humans along with fish when
water resources are divvied up in sufficing the needs of
fisheries and the needs of the agriculture industries.
Justice Wagner directed the federal government to use only
precise scientific studies (not human or computer estimates
or predictions) to determine the exact impact reduced water
would have on fish populations.
The judge set the stage for change in the EPA mandates. One
would think that lawmakers on Capitol Hill would have come
to the same, or a similar, conclusion regarding the EPA when
witnessing such economic deviation having taken place over
the years in communities that relied on the timber and
agriculture industries. I guess the lawmakers need to keep
their special interest groups satisfied - another reason we
need term limits for all those we elect to service in
Washington DC.
(Permission to post from the publisher.)