Become a friend of

   the Klamath Bucket  

            Brigade

   Send Donations Here

     All donations are tax  

             deductible

 

 

 This Website is Dedicated to

 Alvin Alexander Cheyne

January 10, 1921 - June 17, 2005

 

 

 

      

Word from Webster - - - Obstructionist mania

 

 

Pioneer Press

Fort Jones , CA 96032

Wednesday, June 20, 2007

Page E10, Column 4

 

If I were a betting man, I'd place my wager that most of the dams on the Klamath River will be coming out.


In some ways I may be premature in placing this bet and I could be made a fool of later.
In all actuality, the Klamath Dam debate is obstructionism at its finest. Actually, there is nothing "fine" about obstructionism - it's detrimental to unity, community and the spirit of finding the middle ground to move forward.

 

One would think that the praise-be-Al-Gore crowd would be clamoring to save dams which produce cheap, renewable energy without harming the carbon footprint. The more dams producing power the less of Gore's global warming.


The Klamath Dams are just the beginning. O'Shaughnessy, Hetch Hetchy, Elwha and Matilija are next on the hit list. The amazing aspect of the rest of these dams is they're actually the ones servicing the major metropolitan areas in which the obstructionists are living.


But the fish, what about the fish?


While, an obstructionist isn't pro-fish when it comes down to the bottom line. Pacific Power was willing to spend $350 million to place fish-ladders at its dam sites to allow the fish safe passage. The obstructionists are rejecting the fish ladders.


What about the fish?


Yes, Pacific Power is footing the bill for the fish hatchery which is producing 25 percent of the chinook salmon every year in the Klamath.


The obstructionists, headed by Robert Kennedy Jr. is suing on the grounds that the hatchery is releasing too much toxic discharge.


Maybe you think the obstructionists are looking for alternative methods of power production which are cleaner and greener than the Klamath dams.


How about the wind? Absolutely not. The obstructionists call wind farms "cuisinarts of the sky" and have sued the farms for shredding migratory birds.


Solar is green and clean, isn't it? No way. The solar solution involves placing large mirrors all over the beautiful
Mojave Desert , a concept the Sierra Club testified against before congress.


Well then, surely geothermal is alright and the perfect green, clean method to replace the unclean-non-green dams. Hold your horses, Sister Sue, you know what happens there. The same folks seeking to remove the dams valiantly fought the geothermal solution as it would harm sacred, protected land.


We go back to the premise that obstructionists aren't seeking solutions, they seek annihilation. Humans aren't part of the solution or figured into the equation, humans are the problem in their minds.


I would agree with this latter assessment in part. Humans are part of the problem, but not all humans, just the obstructionists. Take Al Gore for example. He lives in a 6,000 square foot mansion with a fleet of planes and limos - literally.

 

Al Gore alone could single handily turn around the global warming problem simply by riding a bicycle.

 

-Daniel Webster

 

(Permission to post from the publisher.)