Will transitional towns lead to the Wildlands Project?

By Nita Still, Montague

Guest Opinion

Pioneer Press

Fort Jones, CA

Wednesday, May 26, 2010

page 15, col 1

Well, the GAG's (Green Advocacy Group's) or the NGO's (Non-Governmental Organization's) are at it again. In California, they began by establishing Willits as the first Transitional Town and Mt. Shasta as the 18th Transitional Town. Santa Cruz is around numbers 23. (Check out "Shasta Commons"). This means they want to make Transitional Towns in all cities of all states and the world to use no oil and be concerned about the climate change we are supposed to be causing.

Now these NGO's have come up with another scheme by the help of a Mt. Shasta City Attorney. It is called, "Mt. Shasta Community Water Rights and Self-Government Ordinance." It is an ordinance to supposedly protect the rights of humans and especially all wildlife, flora, fauna and ecosystems. There is a lot of suing allowed, especially "if a resident becomes toxic," from one of the corporations: "if they put toxic material within the body of any resident of Mt. Shasta or within any natural community within the city, it is a reason for the violation of the prohibitions of this ordinance." "This ordinance will establish water rights for residents, "natural communities" (wildlife, flora, fauna) and ecosystems (wetlands, streams, rivers) and ABOLISH private property rights that conflict with this ordinance." This is the First Plank of the Communist Manifesto. Remember the Head Waters of the Sacramento is located in the Mt. Shasta Park and the "ordinance does not want to share any water with any other city."

These cities must be Sustainable, especially for any ecosystem, all wildlife, fauna and flora. It is a means to establish Local Agenda 21, which will end up as Agenda 21, or the Wildlands Project or the Biodiversity Treaty, created in 1992 at the United Nations, Rio De Janeiro Convention. Corporations will not have the rights as persons. This ordinance calls us, residents. We are Constitutionally, PEOPLE.

They also say: "The ordinance would allow "natural communities and the ecosystem" to be a "person" for the enforcement of the ordinance." They are using the same tactics which they used with the salmon, an owl, a tiny bird; to our Klamath River, cutting logging in half, closing roads, removing water from farming, ranching, removing patented water rights, our dams and on and on. They are using the ESA (Endangered Species Act, the EPA or Environmental Protection Agency) and Saul Alinsky's 13 "Rules for Radicals," to get any and everything they want. Rule number five is ridicule and denial. What they want is our water, land and even our lives because they say there are too many people on this planet for all the animals to live properly. (Check out the "Rewilding Project.") After all, animals are much more important than humans and they must save them for posterity.

We have an existing, crappy Democracy, where a few people bloviate their demands to the many what to do. When you read the ordinance you will know what I mean. Just look at what our government is doing to our Freedoms, all using the same tactics. They all are also creating a National Monument in Siskiyou without our permission.

This ordinance which will quickly transform the town into being a model for Local Agenda 21. It can also be called, "Green Communism." They want the demise of our welfare! They want to make it impossible for business, growth, even posterity, because all the land will be wilderness and none are allowed in wilderness. They will then herd us down the highways to large cities or camps where there is smart growth, living on top of each other in little houses. Then they will be exceedingly glad.

(Permission to post from the publisher.)