Fishermen reject loans and look for other work

Bodega Bay fisherman Lee Furtado survives because he "has a few pennies put away." Other fishermen have been catching crab or halibut, working non-fishing jobs or buying expensive licenses to fish in far-off waters. Few say they will take government loans. (Light photo by Steven Nellis) Sam Spiewak
June 22, 2006

When the ban on salmon fishing ends on July 26, the fleet in Bodega Bay will have the best-looking fleet of boats in memory.

 
 
Instead of selling salmon, fishermen spend their days priming rail, slathering paint, and polishing decks – that is, when they aren’t writing checks for dock fees or maintenance. One fisherman had his mother on deck for a nice visit. A tourist aimed his camera at the sunny state of emergency.

What he didn’t see were all the missing men: 80 percent of salmon fishermen on the north coast of California have been forced to find other souces of employment, according to the Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen’s Association. Fisherman say that an emergency loan package pro-claimed by Governor Schwarzenegger won’t help, since the rate is more usurious than an average small business loan.

The Klamath: farmers over fish

Low numbers of Chinook salmon returning to spawn in the Klamath River along the California-Oregon border led to the restrictions on salmon fishing. Fish in the Klamath have been dwindling because of damming and irrigation projects over the last 50 years. When the government restricted water from the Klamath to farmers in 2001, President Bush’s adviser Karl Rove promised farmers and agricultural interests that they would get their water back. In 2002 they did.

Against the advice of government biologists, Secretary of the Interior Gale Norton visited the area to turn the spigot back on. The result was the largest fish-kill in West Coast history. The California Department of Fish and Game originally reported 34,000 salmon died because of higher water temperatures and parasites from low flows in the river. In its final report, the agency said the number might have been twice that.
Salmon fishing in Bodega Bay and Bolinas has halted, though sport fishing continues unfettered. On June 6, Gov. Schwarzenegger offered loans to help the commercial fishermen. The Govenor’s proclaimation allowed California’s finance department to set aside $9.2 million to “prevent insolvency and unemployment” in the industry.

"By proclaiming a state of emergency, we are helping the fishermen and communities recover from the hardship and economic loss caused by the severely restricted salmon season," said Governor Schwarzenegger in a statement. But the fishermen in Bodega and Bolinas said the rates of the loan are higher than business loans from local banks. Without ensuring the health of the fishery there is little point in borrowing money against future income that may never materialize, they said.

The emergency loan rates

But are the fishermen correct in their assessment of the loan rate? The terms of the loan are as follows: Fishermen who are unable to obtain credit from commercial banks can qualify for up to $500,000 from a financial development corporation to be paid over 7 years. The interest rate is fixed somewhere between the prime interest rate (which is now at 8 percent) and that rate plus 3 percent. In addition the lender may charge for “out-of-pocket” expenses, as well as a fee of up to 1.5 percent of the loan amount. Collateral is also required.

“It’s worse than the rate I could get at the bank down the street,” said Stan Carpenter, a Bodega Bay fisherman, as he took a break from fixing-up the Sandy B. Last year, the average small business loan from small commercial banks in United States was 8.12 percent, according to a wide-ranging survey by Business Week magazine. Interest rates offered through the disaster assistance program could be as high as 10 percent or as low as 8 percent.

The fishermen might have a hard time applying for the loan since agencies were unaware or confused about of the governor’s action.
“Usually with something like this its just kind of a press release,” thought Marija Voikovich of the California Fish and Game Department. She hadn’t heard of the loans, but Voikovich is listed as a contact person for the program, according to staff at the Govenor’s Office and Department of Finance. “There’s no state budget yet and so there’s no money until the legistlatiors approve a budget,” said Voikovich. “Then we would have to set up a program.”

In fact, interested fishermen in Sonoma and Marin may contact Safe-Bidco at 707-577-8621 to apply for the loans.

More debt? No thanks!

Fishermen in Marin and Sonoma aren’t necessarily interested in the offer.

“Most fisherman aren’t going to be too thrilled about another loan,” said Don Murch, a fisherman in Bolinas. “How are you going to make payments if you’re not bringing in any income?”

“None of the fisherman are taking the loan,” said Stan Carpenter. Carpenter’s grandfathers were both fisherman in California. His brother and his two cousins still operate boats out of Bodega Bay. The bumper sticker of his Ford 250 reads “Support Local Fisherman: Demand California Salmon” (half a mile from the marina, a market sold it for $18.99 a pound). In his glove compartment, Carpenter carries a photocopied chart of Klamath River salmon populations. “Right now, crab is our mainstay,” he said. “I’m barely making wages.”

Those who couldn’t afford to spend the day moored on Bodega Bay were off working other jobs or catching crab or halibut. The man Carpenter employs had gone back to Canada where he could get health care for his injured hand. No meetings were scheduled for fisherman to discuss their situation. A few said they had sent letters to the governor.

“Seems like nothing can be done,” said 65-year-old Lee Furtado in his mildly accented English. Furtado has been a fisherman in Bodega for 15 years. He wore a baseball cap with a picture of a salmon on it and painted primer on the rail of his 48-footer, the Sea Star. He was living off money he had saved from his previous job as a carpenter, he said.
Furtado said he could catch from 40 to 200 salmon in a day and sell those fish from $4 to $2.75 a pound last year. That means the salmon bans costs him anywhere from $880 to $3,200 a day in lost income.

“When you catch a lot of fish you can sell in volume,” he said. When restrictions are lifted on July 26, fishermen will be limited to a catch of 75 fish per day. An experienced fisherman can catch that amount in four or five hours on a good day, according to Bolinas fisherman Josh Churchman.

“We can’t live on one or two fish,” said Furtado. “We are dead in the water.”
 
 
 
 
 
 
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material  herein is distributed without profit or payment to those who have
expressed  a  prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit
research and  educational purposes only. For more information go to:
 http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml


Source:  http://www.ptreyeslight.com/cgi/news.pl?record=112