|
By Jason
Leopold
The Public Record
August 05, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
In
January 2002, at a retreat in West Virginia,
Karl Rove gave a PowerPoint presentation to at
least 50 managers at the Department of the
Interior to discuss polling data, and emphasized
the importance of getting Oregon Senator Gordon
Smith, a Republican, reelected that year.
The way to get Smith reelected to another term,
Rove reportedly told the Interior Department
officials, would come via the agency's support
of a highly controversial measure: diverting
water from the Klamath River Basin to farms in
the area that were experiencing unusually dry
conditions, thereby supporting the GOP's
agricultural base.
If Rove and other White House officials
discussed campaign strategy at federal office
buildings, that would appear to be a violation
of the Hatch Act. Recently, Congress launched an
investigation into a briefing that J. Scott
Jennings, the deputy director of political
affairs, held at the General Services
Administration. In the presentation, Jennings
outlined polling data from the 2006 national
elections and issued a list of the Republican
Party's electoral targets for 2008. Jennings's
presentation may violate a law known as the
Hatch Act, which prohibits the use of government
resources for political purposes.
That investigation is still ongoing.
Details of Rove's involvement in influencing
the Interior Department to reverse its policies
with regard to the Klamath River basin have been
previously reported. But questions about why a
political operative like Rove was influencing
agricultural and environmental policy decisions,
possibly in violation of the law, and whether he
pressured cabinet officials to reverse policy to
get Republicans re-elected were raised again
during a sworn deposition Rove's former
executive assistant, Susan Ralston, gave to
Congressional investigators probing Rove's role
in the US attorney scandal and his and other
White House officials connections with disgraced
lobbyist Jack Abramoff.
A transcript of Ralston's deposition was
released last year by Congressman Henry Waxman,
the Democratic chairman of the House Oversight
and Government Reform Committee.
According to Congressional investigators, Rove
used the PowerPoint presentation at the West
Virginia retreat to solicit Republican donors.
But Rove's priority was to ensure that farmers
in Oregon got the additional water they wanted
from the Klamath River, so Senator Smith would
be re-elected. President Bush lost Oregon by
less than one percent in the 2000 presidential
election to Al Gore, according to polling
results from the Associated Press.
Laying the groundwork to get Smith reelected,
Rove set up a cabinet-level task force on
Klamath River issues to specifically study
whether diverting water from Klamath River to
farmers would hurt the endangered salmon
population. The task force Rove set up gave the
impression that the administration was going to
take an unbiased look at the situation.
Michael Kelly, a National Marine Fisheries
Service biologist, insisted that wasn't the
case. Kelly spoke out publicly in 2003 alleging
that he was subjected to political pressure and
ordered to ignore scientific evidence that said
the plan would likely kill off tens of thousands
of Coho and Chinook salmon, and to support the
Klamath River low-water plan Rove wanted enacted
to help farmers, who Rove saw as a crucial part
of the Republican constituency in the state.
In March 2002, in a sudden reversal of a long
standing policy, then Secretary of the Interior
Gale Norton and Senator Smith held a joint press
conference in Klamath Falls and opened up the
irrigation system releasing thousands of gallons
of water to 220,000 acres of farmland. The
policy shift left the Klamath River basin with
unusually low river flows that summer and ended
up killing more than 30,000 endangered Coho
salmon - the largest fish kill in the history of
the West. But the move, as orchestrated by Rove,
ended up getting Smith reelected that November.
A year later, a federal judge issued a ruling
saying the Bush administration violated the
Endangered Species Act by allowing water to be
diverted to farmers from Klamath River.
Rove's meeting with Interior Department
officials where he discussed campaign strategy
underscores the level of influence Rove has
successfully exerted upon every federal
government office. From the Department of
Agriculture to the Department of Transportation,
and going as far back as the beginning of
President Bush's first term, Rove appears to
view federal agencies as a division of the
Republican National Committee where he can call
on officials for political favors. Now,
Congressional investigators appear interested in
determining exactly how much influence Rove
wielded over federal agencies and whether
anything improper occurred during the routine
political briefings Rove gave to the various
agency officials.
With regard to Rove's role in the Klamath River
basin matter, Ralston said she recalled that
Rove and his aides discussed, as a "policy
matter," the issue on "multiple occasions"
during closed-door meetings in Rove's office at
the White House.
"This subject did come up frequently in our
directors' meeting," Ralston said, adding that
she could not specifically recall the number of
times the matter was discussed but "it was
definitely mentioned on multiple occasions."
Senator John Kerry called for an investigation
in the summer of 2002 to determine whether Rove
shaped the Interior Department's decision to
divert water from Klamath River to farmers. The
Interior Department's inspector general
concluded that department officials based their
decision on science; a conclusion biologists
vehemently disagreed with at the time based on
their own scientific evidence. However, the
inspector general's findings did not address
whether Rove influenced the department's
decision to divert water from Klamath River to
farmers following his presentation to department
officials about Oregon's Senatorial campaign.
Still, political briefings such as the one Rove
held for Interior Department officials in 2002
have become routine and an important part of the
Bush administration's political strategy. The
White House has sought to downplay the number of
political briefings held for agency officials
during the past four years. But according to
Ralston's deposition, she said the briefings
were far more extensive than the White House has
claimed.
Ralston said that officials in Rove's shop, the
Office of Political Affairs, would regularly
brief political appointees at federal agencies
about "target states" Republicans needed to
focus heavily on to win an election, and efforts
cabinet officials needed to take with regard to
policy to ensure Republicans were reelected.
Ralston told Congressional attorneys that
Mehlman and Barry Jackson, Rove's deputy on
policy, were largely responsible for briefing
various federal agencies about upcoming
elections. However, Rove personally visited each
of the major cabinet agencies to provide
officials with "target states" on which
Republicans needed to focus. The briefings,
Ralston said, became more frequent during
campaign season.
"Some agencies had more than one political
briefing during an election cycle," Ralston said
in her deposition. "For example, at Commerce,
reportedly, political appointees attended an
Office of Political Affairs presentation at the
agency and then the [Commerce] secretary with
senior Commerce political staff, attended a
second private briefing at the White House ...
the Office of Political Affairs would draft [the
presentations]. They would get [polling]
information from somebody on staff who ... had
experience in polling information and sometimes
they did get it from the RNC." |