Last Monday
the Interior Department
published a draft report
summarizing two years of
scientific and technical
studies conducted to help
inform a forthcoming
decision on whether to
remove four hydroelectric
dams on the Klamath River,
per the Klamath
Hydroelectric Settlement
Agreement (KHSA) of 2010.
The comprehensive draft
report, entitled Klamath Dam
Removal Overview Report for
the Secretary of the
Interior: an Assessment of
Science and Technical
Information (Overview
Report), and each individual
study conducted on the
environmental and economic
impacts of the potential dam
removal, are available at
www.KlamathRestoration.gov.
The Klamath Basin, covering
over 12,000 square miles in
southern Oregon and northern
California, contains many
natural resources and
economic opportunities
related to fisheries,
farming, ranching, timber
harvest, mining, and
recreation. Each of these
resources and opportunities
has sustained communities
throughout the basin for
many decades.
The Klamath Basin is home to
six federally recognized
Indian tribes who have
depended on many of these
same natural resources for
thousands of years to
support their way of life
and spiritual wellbeing.
Natural resources in the
basin, including clean
water, abundant and reliable
supplies of fish, and
terrestrial plants and
animals, are central to
their cultural identity.
The
construction of PacifiCorp's
hydroelectric dams on the
Klamath River combined with
irrigated agriculture, both
beginning in the early
1900s, contributed to
declines in fisheries and
water quality as well as to
detrimental impacts to
tribal resources and culture
throughout the Klamath
Basin.
Present crises in
agricultural water
availability and fish
populations combined with
relicensing requirements to
lead basin stakeholders to
come to agreement on the
KHSA and the Klamath Basin
Restoration Agreement to
remove four of these dams.
The report presents a
summary of dozens of reports
regarding the economics,
engineering, biology, water
quality, recreation and real
estate impacts of dam
removal that were first
published last September.
"The science and analyses
presented in these reports
are vital to making an
informed and sound decision
on the Klamath River dam
removal," said Secretary of
the Interior Ken Salazar.
"As we work toward
strengthening the health and
economic prosperity of all
that depends on the Klamath
- including our watersheds,
fisheries, and forests - I
encourage members of the
public to offer their input
on this draft overview
report and perspectives on
the opportunity that lies
ahead."
The economic reports
analyzed find that dam
removal and implementation
of the related watershedwide
restoration program provide
an opportunity to bring
significant additional jobs
to the region and strengthen
local economies in the
Klamath Basin for reasons
that include improved fish
populations; additional
recreational and commercial
fishing opportunities; and
increased agricultural
output due to more certainty
in water deliveries. As part
of its commitment to
openness, transparency and
scientific integrity, the
Interior Department is
arranging for a scientific
peer review of the report by
a sixmember independent
panel.
In addition, the Department
is encouraging the public to
review and offer technical
comments on the draft report
for the peer reviewers to
consider during their
deliberations.
The public comment period on
the draft report is open
from Jan. 24 through Feb. 5,
2012. Comments received
after this date will not be
considered by the peer
reviewers so it is vital
that public comments be
emailed to: ksdor@atkinsglobal.com.
The chairman of the House
water and power subcommittee
strongly opposes dam removal
leading fellow Republican
and our representative Wally
Herger to email me the
following rhetoric: "I have
long been an advocate for
reforming misguided
environmental laws and I
have joined my colleagues on
multiple occasions with
legislation to reform our
regulatory environment.
I will continue to be a
strong advocate for our
private property rights,
common-sense natural
resources management, and
the rural way of life we
enjoy in Northern
California. I will actively
oppose federal funding for
job-killing proposals that
are masked by the feel-good
word "sustainability."
I encourage all to take time
to review the report rather
than wallow in Wally's
knee-jerk politics.
In my opinion sustainability
is far more than a
"feel-good word" but is the
key to the equitable,
environmentally sound, and
lasting solution of vexing
contemporary issues and
problems.
Only with thorough and
balanced consideration of
all aspects of the area can
we ensure water and economic
vitality in the Klamath
basin.
---------
Richard
Mazzucchi is a retired
research engineer
specializing in energy
efficiency and renewable
energy. He has travelled
extensively and now makes
his home in Los Molinos,
where he is striving to
manifest a sustainable

