Become a friend of

   the Klamath Bucket  

            Brigade

   Send Donations Here

     All donations are tax  

             deductible

 

 

 This Website is Dedicated to

 Alvin Alexander Cheyne

January 10, 1921 - June 17, 2005

 

 

 

      

Salmon Advocates Applaud Federal Appeals Court Ruling to Safeguard Columbia Basin Salmon Plan


Ninth Circuit Court Upholds
Lower Court Ruling That 2004 Biological Opinion Violates ESA and Fails to Consider Impact of Snake River Dams on Salmon Recovery

By: Save Our Wild Salmon
Apr 10, 2007



 


Salmon advocates today hailed a ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit that rejected the Bush Administration's salmon plan for the Columbia-Snake River Basin . The Ninth Circuit upheld a lower court decision that ruled illegal a federal plan for dam operations on the Columbia and lower Snake Rivers for its failure to comply with the Endangered Species Act.

Writing that "ESA compliance is not optional," Judge Sidney R. Thomas noted for the Court that "agencies may not disregard their ESA duties ... Rather, they have an affirmative duty to satisfy the ESA's requirements, as a first priority."

Attorneys representing the broad-base coalition of fishing business and conservation groups applauded the Court's ruling to affirm the lower court's decision. "The Court has sent a strong message to the Administration that it cannot ignore the requirements of the Endangered Species Act and must stop manipulating the
Columbia and Snake Rivers in ways that drive our region's salmon to extinction," said Steve Mashuda of Earthjustice, an attorney for the coalition of plaintiff groups. "This decision should compel the federal agencies to finally produce an analysis that looks at all recovery options -- including removing the four lower Snake River dams, and develop a solution that works for people and fish."

In its opinion today, the 9th Circuit called the invalidated 2004 BiOp "little more than an analytical slight of hand, manipulating the variables to achieve a 'no jeopardy' finding." Under this approach, the Court added, "a listed species could be gradually destroyed, so long as each step on the path to destruction is sufficiently modest. This type of slow slide into oblivion is one of the very ills the ESA seeks to prevent."

"Two decades of federal failure and dishonesty must stop here. With today's decision, it should be clear that the law, the science and the economics are in agreement," said Dan Ritzman, Northwest Regional Director for The Sierra Club. "It is time for this administration to follow the law and follow the science to develop a legal plan to restore
Columbia and Snake River salmon. Our region needs a scientifically sound, economically viable solution, and that solution includes removing the four dams on the lower Snake River ."

In May 2005, federal district court Judge James A. Redden threw out the 2004 Federal Columbia River Power System (FCRPS) plan governing federal dam operations on the
Columbia and lower Snake Rivers , citing its failure to adequately address restoration of ESA-listed wild Snake River salmon and steelhead. He termed the Biological Opinion (BiOp), which treated dams as an immutable part of the natural environment that could not be changed or altered, "arbitrary, capricious and contrary to law." As a result, the plan was remanded by the Judge and is currently being redrafted.

In an effort to further evade compliance with the Endangered Species Act to restore and recover wild salmon and steelhead in the Columbia Basin, the federal agencies responsible for the illegal plan, including NOAA/National Marine Fisheries Service, United States Army Corps of Engineers, and United States Bureau of Reclamation, filed an appeal in Federal Court late last year.

"Today's ruling is a victory not just for salmon, but for the economy and the people of the Pacific Northwest, and our NW way of life, which includes stable jobs, good fishing, reliable energy and abundant salmon," said James Schroeder, Senior Environmental Policy Specialist, National Wildlife Federation, the lead plaintiff in the case. "This decision from the Court clears the way for development of real, honest solutions that will benefit the entire region, solutions that put neither fishing nor farming communities at risk. But to get there, we must have real leadership and resolve in the region to finally examine what it will take to meet our responsibility to restore salmon in the
Columbia basin."

Confirming that the Endangered Species Act mandates a comprehensive analysis, not the limited analysis the Administration had conducted, the 9th Circuit, like the district Court earlier, ruled that NMFS may not "conduct the bulk of its jeopardy analysis in a vacuum."

"We have been forced to turn to the courts because the federal government has repeatedly failed to deliver an effective salmon plan, and our elected leaders have failed to step in to fill the void," said Zeke Grader, Executive Director of the Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations (PCFFA), an organization of commercial fishing groups throughout California, Oregon, Washington and Alaska. "With salmon returns continuing to decline and fishing seasons being curtailed again, it is clearer than ever that we must change the way we manage water in this basin. These court rulings set the table for our region to finally examine what is required to meet our responsibility to restore salmon in the
Columbia Basin , and in the process, protect and restore the resources, economies, and way of life of the Pacific Salmon states."

Returns of wild
Snake River spring/summer chinook once exceeded 1.5 million annually, accounting for more than half of the entire Columbia Basin 's spring/summer chinook run. Prior to the construction of the lower Snake River dams in the late 1960s, returns still topped 100,000 per year. Last year, only about 17,000 total fish returned past Lower Granite Dam on the lower Snake River, a number that represents little real improvement from 1992, when Snake River spring/summer chinook were first protected by the Endangered Species Act.

Plaintiffs in the case include National Wildlife Foundation, Idaho Wildlife Federation, Washington Wildlife Foundation, Sierra Club, Trout Unlimited, Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations, Institute for Fisheries Resources, Idaho Rivers United, Idaho Steelhead and Salmon United, Northwest Sportfishing Industry Association, Friends of the Earth, Salmon for All, Columbia Riverkeepers, Northwest Energy Coalition, Federation of Fly Fishers, and
American Rivers .

For more information, please visit http://www.wildsalmon.org/.

With a combined membership of over six million, Save Our Wild Salmon is a nationwide coalition of businesses, conservation organizations, commercial and sportfishing associations, river groups and taxpayer advocates working collectively to restore healthy and abundant wild salmon to the rivers and streams of the Pacific Northwest.



+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material  herein is distributed without profit or payment to those who have
expressed  a  prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit
research and  educational purposes only. For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

 

Source:  http://www.yubanet.com/artman/publish/article_54494.shtml