This editorial
appeared in The Sacramento Bee.
The California Department
of Fish and Game said "no" to fish this
week and "yes" to gold miners. Even
though experts within DFG have said that
suction dredge gold mining is having
"deleterious effects on fish," including
endangered coho salmon, the department
declined to further restrict gold miners
who use giant dredges to vacuum up rock
and sand from creek and river bottoms,
likely killing fish in the process.
In a petition to the
state, the Karuk Indian Tribe and
several environmental organizations had
asked the department to curtail dredging
on sensitive stretches of waterway. The
department said it could not act until
it completed a court-ordered review of
the issue. But DFG was supposed to
complete that review last July. It
hasn't even begun.
Meanwhile, so serious
is the decline of salmon that federal
regulators banned fishing off the coasts
of California and Oregon last year.
State officials say the mining
restriction requested by the Karuks
would do nothing to address ocean
conditions, which are suspected to be
the main cause of the decline. Suction
dredge gold miners insist that global
warming and dams are the culprits and
that their mining operations actually
improve fish habitat.
No doubt global
warming, dams, logging, pesticides and
other human activities kill fish and
destroy habitat, but the bulk of the
science strongly suggests that suction
dredge mining harms fish, too.
As salmon populations
dwindle, the state agency charged with
protecting them protects gold miners
instead.