The immense human tragedy unfolding along America's
Gulf Coast has consumed the news media's coverage of items of national
interest. So you may not know that Congress is now considering a piece of
legislation with immense implications to our country.
It's called TESRA, an acronym for the Threatened and Endangered Species
Recovery Act of 2005. It is the first update and modernization in more than 30
years of the Endangered Species Act. The U.S. House of Representatives
Resource Committee has been working on the legislation for two years and will
be ready to bring the bill to the full House floor the week of Sept. 26.
|
|
This Congressional action is truly gratifying. Our
country -- and the West in particular -- desperately needs the improvements it
brings to the Endangered Species Act.
Consider this: In the past 31 years, more than 1,300 species were listed as
endangered; only 10 have actually been recovered. Meanwhile, radical
environmental groups have been busy manipulating the Act to put people out of
work and intrude upon private property rights.
By any reasonable standard of performance, that track record is simply
unacceptable. That dismal success rate should stand as a classic symbol of
failure not success.
If we are serious as a nation about protecting and recovering endangered
species, while at the same time protecting private property rights, then we
must do better. This updated and modernized version does just that. The
Resources Committee has worked on this issue for the past two years, and has
identified most problems of interest to water users through field hearings.
TESRA 2005 calls for updating and modernizing the ESA
so federal agencies can use the best available science in decision-making,
provide incentives to encourage landowners to participate in recovery efforts
and involve local, state and tribal governments in the process.
It is designed to help recover endangered species without endangering the jobs
and livelihoods of American families by requiring that economic impacts and
benefits be considered before final designation of critical habitat. This
includes landowners' revenue as well as the impact on revenues of state and
local governments. Because most of the habitat of listed species is on private
land, the bill also will uphold the right of citizens to seek just
compensation for the "taking" of private property.
That's critical to Idaho because we have repeatedly seen how families and
communities are hurt by the ESA as it stands now. The 2001 Klamath Basin
disaster was a direct result of the current ESA. Idaho's water has been under
siege for more than a decade now by groups who continue to distort and misuse
the Act.
Environmental activists will clamor that any changes in the status quo will
"gut" the ESA. What those changes really mean is a return to some
semblance of balance and reality from well-intentioned Federal law that has
simply failed to do what was intended.
I urge all Idahoans to embrace this vital effort and to do everything they can
to help make TESRA 2005 a reality.
Source: http://www.agweekly.com/articles/2005/10/17/news/opinion/opin04.txt