|
|
|
|
Daily News Photo Jamie Gentner - From left,
District 2 Assemblyman Doug LaMalfa, California Farm Bureau
Federation Attorney Tony Francois, SOSS Director Bill Krum, Sen.
Sam Aanestad’s field representative Nadine Bailey and Siskiyou
County rancher/farmer Jack Cowley sit on a panel that informed
Shasta and Scott valley water users of the special watermaster
district that was created through LaMalfa’s AB 1580 on Friday in
Yreka.
|
To achieve that, they gathered in Yreka and
About 150 people attended
the meeting at the Yreka Community Theater at
Attendees heard from Save Our Shasta and Scott Valleys Coalition (SOSS)
Executive Director Ernie Wilkinson; SOSS Director and
First, Krum explained the background of watermaster service in the area
and a preliminary budget for local service.
In the 2002-2004 tax
years, the Department of Water Resources (DWR) received about $170,000
for watermaster service - half from the water users and half from the
state.
But in 2004, state law was changed so that the state would no longer pay
for half of the bill, and the cost of service went up to just under
$400,000.
When people from
The DWR was also able to
secure a grant from the Bureau of Reclamation to cover extra costs, so
the water users’ costs haven’t gone up.
But now, the cost is over half a million dollars, and the state will no
longer pick up half the cost, especially with their own budget crisis.
’You’ve dodged the bullet the past couple of years in this part of
the state,’ LaMalfa said during his speech. ’But that won’t happen
forever. The state budget is crumbling before our eyes. We’re fighting
as hard as we can in the Legislature, but, ultimately, this is just
crumbs in the budget.’
Bill Mendenhall, a
supervising engineer with DWR present at the Yreka meeting, said the
costs have been increasing because, in the past, DWR was making up for
the excess amount through local assistance programs no longer available.
The costs were there, he said, but water users were not seeing them.
Krum finished by telling the crowd that if they stayed with watermaster
service at the state level, they would be looking at a six-fold increase
in costs, whereas it has been estimated that the local district could
provide watermaster service for around $200,000.
Francois spoke next about
the experience
’The people here locally can do this based on their true costs. There
will be no state entity trying to cover their overhead,’ LaMalfa said
when he took the stage next. ’I can live with that, and that’s why
I’m here to help with whatever can move this process along.’
Bailey said Aanestad jumped at the opportunity to help
’The bill puts this
issue in your back yard so you don’t have to drive to Sacramento and
be one of a million people asking something of the government,’ Bailey
said. ’You’ll be working with locals, and the senator encourages you
to look hard at how to make that work.’
Part of the process of making that work is petitioning the court to make
the special district the watermaster service provider.
’The legislation created the district, but you, as water right
holders, decide if you want the district to be the watermaster,’
Francois said.
The watermaster is a
court official that is responsible for ensuring that water rights are
enforced. If the district were given this power, they would be held to
the same laws as other districts - holding open meetings, providing an
agenda before the meeting, etc.
The special district would be governed by seven board members, which the
Siskiyou County Board of Supervisors will appoint.
They are currently advertising the positions and will likely make their
appointments at their Feb. 5 meeting, Francois said.
To petition the court,
Borden explained, 15 percent of diversion owners must submit a
representation agreement to Ellison, Schneider & Harris, LLP - the
law firm hired by the CFBF to take their case to court.
Agreements were handed out to those at the meetings, and Borden
explained how to fill them out and submit them.
All diversion owners in the valleys will receive a copy of the petition,
and Borden said all petitions should be returned by Feb. 1.
But while 15 percent is
the number that is legally required, the officials speaking at the
meeting said they want more.
’We’re not looking for just 15 percent,’ said Jack Cowley, a
former SOSS director and current
To see the bill, visit LaMalfa’s Web site: www.assembly.ca.gov/La_Malfa.
For more information about the new district or process, call Wilkinson
at 468-2896 or Borden at (916) 561-5659.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those
who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for
non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more information go
to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
Source:
http://www.siskiyoudaily.com/articles/2008/01/15/news/6411508news2.txt