The remark was made during a spirited discussion at
Tuesday’s board of supervisors meeting.
Supervisors and others discussed what the county should
do in face of Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s veto last
month of $28 million to fund the act that has helped
preserve agricultural lands and open spaces in
California since 1965.
Land owners who sign a Williamson Act contract get
substantial breaks on their property taxes by agreeing
to keep the land in agricultural production or as open
space. The state has been subsidizing the counties for
the loss in property tax through a subvention program.
Siskiyou County had been receiving about $780,000 per
year in subvention payments. Last year it was cut to
$700,000. This budget year it will be zero unless the
program is restored by a lawsuit, by the Legislature, or
by the governor. Farmers, ranchers and environmental
groups support the program.
Public Health and Community Development Department
Director Terry Barber pointed out that seven contract
applications are currently “in the pipeline” and she
needed guidance as to how to move forward. Two of the
applications are for amendments to existing contracts
and five are new applications for an additional 1,446
acres to be put into the program.
She informed the
board that there are currently 419,000 acres, over 10
percent of the county, involved with Williamson Act
contracts.
The supervisors unanimously voted to accept the new
applications and give the applicants the option to
withdraw or continue at a later date pending what
happens to the Williamson Act funding. If an application
were withdrawn, the unused portion of their $600 fee
would be returned.
After much discussion, the supervisors also voted
unanimously to continue with the Williamson Act program
whether it is funded or not. The vote was remarkable
since both Barber and county counsel Tom Guarino pointed
out that the current contracts are self-renewing and
that a vote was not necessary.
The only way the existing contracts would not be renewed
would be if a vote were taken to discontinue the
program, explained Barber.
Senior county assessor Lauri Foster said there are about
400 Williamson Act contracts currently in effect.
“In a nutshell, if we are looking at non-renewal, the
tax liability of these property owners could double.
Some would quadruple and some could be 10 times as much.
It’s not simple, each parcel would have to be assessed
separately,” she said.
Planning Director Greg Plucker spoke during the
discussion also.
During a public comment period, Jim Morrison of the
Siskiyou County Farm Bureau asked the supervisors to
honor the existing Williamson Act contracts. Otherwise,
he said, the increased taxes would be burdensome.
“But if these people were forced to subdivide their
land, it could be worse for the county,” he added.
Lifelong Scott Valley property owner Mike Bryan also
spoke in favor of honoring the contracts. Otherwise, he
said he could make more money by subdividing his land.
He asked the board to “do everything in your power to
preserve open space.”
Jack Cowley, of the Siskiyou County and California
Cattlemen’s Association, said he’s been involved with
the Williamson Act for years. He said California is
expecting a population increase of one million people.
“Agricultural land is necessary to feed the people,” he
said. “We have to have land to produce food.”
Supervisor Marcia Armstrong said it is important to
recognize that Siskiyou County’s economy is
agricultural, which, she said, generates twice as much
revenue as tourism.
“It’s really important that we support agriculture,” she
said in an emotional statement.
“I would like to believe that the funding will come
back,” said Supervisor Ed Valenzuela, “but if it
doesn’t, where do we get the $700,000 that we will miss
out on?”
All five supervisors voted to support agriculture and
open spaces in the county and continue with the
Williamson Act contracts whether the subvention money
comes in from the state or not.
County Administrative Officer Brian McDermott had lunch
with Assemblyman Jim Nielson Wednesday. McDermott said
Nielson understands the position of the county and said
“he will do everything he can to help restore
[Williamson Act] funding.”
Comments (1)
1854census
Since property values throughout the county are being assessed at lower levels (less property taxes) and the money won't be there to reimburse the ranchers' reduced taxes, where is the county going to get money to keep paying the supes to be stupes? Other counties decided to do nothing until the state budget lawsuits run through the courts. The supes must have been desperate for some applause and cheers from a crowd they know will side with them.
As far as ag $ being twice the revenue as tourism, I would like to see the figures.
All this does is show whose backs the stupes have- their own and then whoever will cheer for them...
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml