The Web site devoted to the conference describes the
negotiations behind two agreements, one which provides for the
possible removal of four dams along the Klamath River, and one
which sets up a restoration plan for the entire Klamath Basin –
the Klamath Hydroelectric Settlement Agreement (KHSA) and the
Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement, respectively.
“The negotiations were launched by a massive fish kill in 2002,
when water was directed away from the river for irrigation
purposes, resulting in approximately 50,000 adult salmon dying
in the river. The agreements are historic, creating the basis
for the largest dam removal project in history and bringing
together the dam owner, farmers, [fishermen], Indian tribes,
governments and environmentalists. The panel will discuss the
unique importance of the river to native people, the challenge
and opportunity of multi-party negotiations and the necessity of
the public/private partnership in this transaction,” the site
reads.
The session’s moderator is scheduled to be Kirk E. Miller, chief
counsel for the California Resources Agency, with panelists John
Bezdek of the United States Department of the Interior (DOI),
Dean Brockbank of dam owner PacifiCorp, Troy Fletcher of the
Yurok Tribe and Richard Roos-Collins of the Natural Heritage
Institute.
Guarino drafted and sent a letter to the Executive Committee
Environmental Law Section of the California State Bar, stating,
“These speakers represent the proponents in favor of dam removal
and give you an exceptionally one-sided panel that has
continually presented a skewed view of these agreements and
negotiations.”
The DOI, represented by Bezdek, is the agency from which the dam
removal decision will come, as Secretary of the Interior Ken
Salazar will be making the decision after the completion of
numerous studies on the potential effects of dam removal.
PacifiCorp and the Yurok Tribe are both signatories to the KHSA.
According to the Natural Heritage Institute Web site,
Roos-Collins is the institute’s director of legal services, and
since 1991, “has represented public agencies and non-profit
organizations in water and energy matters.”
Upon hearing that Miller would be the moderator, some of the
supervisors laughed, however, no discussion regarding their
reaction ensued.
Guarino expresses a concern in his letter that the panel does
not feature a representative from a group that did not agree to
sign on to the agreements, stating, “In the past, panels have
been balanced and have at least provided the attendees the
opportunity to hear both sides of the issue.”
Guarino mentions in the letter that Siskiyou County has been a
long-time participant in the negotiations, concluding his letter
by stating, “It is respectfully requested that the members of
the Environmental Law Section Executive Committee seriously
consider balancing this panel so that a skewed view is not
presented to the many practitioners who attend this conference.”
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107,
any copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or
payment to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this
information for non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more
information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml