|
|
|
|
|
Photo by Deborra Brannon - After the Board of Supervisors held a lengthy first public hearing on the proposed Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement and planned a second public hearing, opponents to the agreement raise their hands. |
Proposed
agreement says that removal of four lower Klamath dams ’is a necessary
part of overall restoration effort’
By DEBORRA BRANNON
Daily News Managing Editor
The board of supervisors held the first of what will likely be several
public hearings on the proposed agreement during their regular meeting.
Among the members of the public who packed the board chambers for the
hearing, there was clear majority opposition to the document, although
one person spoke in favor of it.
The proposed agreement is one of two that would need approval taken
together in order to provide the ’comprehensive solution’ envisioned
by the settlement group.
PacifiCorp representative Toby Freeman said Tuesday that the proposed
agreement reached by the settlement group involves a ’host’ of other
Klamath basin issues, and is ’predicated on an agreement yet to be
reached with PacifiCorp.’
Supervisor Bill Overman
invited Freeman to speak on behalf of PacifiCorp as the public comment
period began
’I think the motivation behind this is to force us into an agreement
that would involve dam removal,’ Freeman said. ’I’m not saying
that a dam removal agreement is definitely off the table, but thus far
there is no indication that dam removal is the least costly solution.’
A summary provided at the Web site www.edsheets.com/Klamathdocs.html
states the intention behind the agreement as being ’effective and
durable solutions’ which will restore production of fish species
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those
who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for
non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more information go
to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
Source:
http://www.siskiyoudaily.com/articles/2008/01/23/news/5812308news1.txt