By David Smith
Siskiyou Daily News
February 17, 2009
Yreka, Calif. - Following in the same
vein as other possible liabilities, the report cites
“The effectiveness and options for mitigating the
potential impact of rising groundwater during reservoir
drawdown; the potential for higher stream levels causing
higher groundwater levels, which could affect septic
systems; and the presence of contaminated sediment could
cause leaching of contaminants into groundwater” as
possible decommissioning liabilities related to
groundwater.
The report states that taking out the
dams could result in a decrease in groundwater levels in
the upper Klamath area and an increase in groundwater
levels in the lower Klamath area. Under the assumption
that levels would decrease, the report states that
sections of the upper Klamath River that are cooled by
groundwater contributions may experience higher
temperatures due to the decrease.
The report states, “Groundwater
contribution to the river is a low liability with low
uncertainty given the assumption that dam removal would
restore the pre-project river conditions and would be
beneficial to river ecology.”
This is also the rationale concerning the
potential increase of groundwater levels in the lower
Klamath area.
Another possible liability explored in
the report is the possible leaching of contaminants into
groundwater sources from the release of contaminated
sediments behind the dams, if any contaminants exist.
“Current studies
indicate that the sediment stored behind the dams is not
contaminated and would have no negative impact on downstream
waters beyond elevated total suspended sediment (TSS) when
the dam is breached, but further studies using a
representative sampling program are necessary to examine
sediments,” the report states.
Additional strategy
regarding groundwater includes determining whether septic
systems are used in the Klamath Basin and how they might be
affected by changes in groundwater.
The final physical liability discussed in the report is the
possible effects of dam removal and decommissioning on water
quality in the Klamath River.
The water quality has
been demonstrably poor in recent years, which is cited in
the report.
“The water quality in the Klamath River from Upper Klamath
Lake to the California state line is impaired due to pH
levels, ammonia and nutrient concentrations, temperatures,
dissolved oxygen, and chlorophyll a.”
The report states that
water quality is “overwhelmingly influenced” by releases
from Upper Klamath Lake and includes that several groups
have suggested that removing the dams will improve water
quality.
Liabilities related to
water quality are listed as “Seasonal shifts in water
temperature, with potential spring and early summer
temperatures higher after decommissioning than current
conditions; long–term elevated levels of TSS in the water
column following dam removal; short–term water quality
degradation during reservoir drawdown, with high TSS, low
dissolved oxygen, and high nutrient concentrations;
long–term water quality changes due to dam removal and
restoration of natural stream conditions;
environmental/regulatory compliance and permitting; and
potentially contaminated sediments.”
The seasonal shift is
assumed in the report to be a low liability because removing
the dams will presumably return the river to pre-project
conditions.
The report states that
sediment erosion after dam removal would result in
heightened levels of TSS in the water column and could also
result in contaminant transport if in fact the sediment
contains contaminants.
The report also claims
that water quality would likely be degraded immediately
downstream from the dams in the form of low dissolved oxygen
and high TSS, which would likely affect aquatic life and
other water users downstream. One other potential liability
discussed is the influence of the Keno Reservoir and Upper
Klamath Lake on water quality in the Klamath River after the
dams are removed.
“Most modeling efforts
predict improvements in water quality conditions following
dam removal, however some indicate significant water quality
impacts following dam removal due to the quality of water in
the Keno Reservoir.”
The report states, “Many
studies have addressed water quality in the Klamath River
and within the reservoirs, and much data has been collected
for the area covered by this report. Several water quality
models have been developed for these reaches.”
The report’s authors,
however, list in the data gaps “Limited water quality data
exists to build existing models,” stating that the solution
would be to “Develop a sampling plan designed specifically
for model development.”
Other recommended
actions include developing a refined water quality model
that will allow an assessment of immediate and short-term
impacts from sediment release and high TSS and also the
development of a model to predict the long–term impacts on
water quality below Keno Dam.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107,
any copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or
payment to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this
information for non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more
information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml