According to Frank, the Klamath Agreements are part of a
vast conspiracy to wrest “local control” of water from the
counties. The problem is that the county currently possesses
zero control of surface waters. Where the county does have
potential control – groundwater – they have abdicated
responsibility, allowing anyone and everyone to pump what
they like and use it as they please. As a result, our rivers
and streams are being sucked dry. In other words, these
so-called “leaders” are protecting certain private interests
and trashing the public interest.
Tallerico and his running buddies on Siskiyou County’s Bored
of Stuporvisors are suffering from a clear case of Sour
Grapes. These folks were not concerned about “regional
governors” and the loss of “local control” when they refused
to allow Del Norte County supervisors into the multi-year
negotiation that led to the Klamath Agreements. That
exclusion was a cynical power play by a county
representative who – like Tallerico – preaches the dogma of
“local control.”
So what does that tell us about Siskiyou County’s current
“leadership”?
The other problem with Frank’s “local control” mantra is –
where does it stop? Why is the county the locus of
sovereignty; why not my town or my own property? What right
does Siskiyou County have to come in and tell me what I must
do with MY sewage on MY own land?
Management of interstate rivers in the American West is
traditionally accomplished through interstate compacts
ratified by all participating states and the federal
government. Sorry, Frank, but water is owned by the people
of the state – not by the county, not by ranchers or
irrigators ... but by the people of the state collectively.
I am no supporter of the KBRA. It IS undemocratic and
unscientific in many respects (see KlamBlog for the
details). But what we need is not Tallerico’s dream of
“local control” or the KBRA’s dream of bureaucratic control
but rather a new Klamath Compact – a federal and state law
empowering a Klamath River Compact Commission to coordinate
and harmonize water management and stream restoration in the
Klamath River Basin under existing laws and authorities.
The Klamath River Compact Commission should have members
representing all governments that have water management
authority in the basin. The federal government, the two
states, all the basin’s federal tribes and all the basin’s
counties should be represented. Because commissioners would
be appointed by elected representatives, the commission
would be answerable to the citizens. Unlike KBRA
negotiations, all meetings and all documents created by the
commission and its staff would be open to all citizens.
Too many Klamath River Basin “leaders” are focused on
advancing the interests they like or are beholden to at the
expense of others. This is not true leadership. True
leadership seeks justice and lives by fairness. Establishing
democratic water management in which all governments with
water management authority have an equal voice is the
American way in the American West. It – not the KBRA or
Frank Tallerico’s “local control” fantasy – should be the
way of the future in the Klamath River Basin.
Felice Pace has lived in the Klamath River Basin since
1975, mostly in the Scott River Valley. He currently lives
near the mouth of the Klamath River, where he writes
KlamBlog (www.KlamBlog.blogspot.com).
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107,
any copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or
payment to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this
information for non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more
information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml