|







|
Become a friend of
the Klamath Bucket
Brigade
Send
Donations Here
All donations are tax
deductible
|
|
This Website is Dedicated to
Alvin Alexander Cheyne
January
10, 1921 - June 17, 2005
|
|
|

Brown,
Elliott & Switzer, your attention is requested
February
13, 2008
Commissioners Brown,
Elliott & Switzer:
You have all been on my
email lists for some time now. You are each aware of the importance I
attach to words, phrases and definitions. You know my efforts are
dedicated and devoted to property rights. With that in mind, I ask you
to consider that the residents of the
Klamath
Basin
are not
"stakeholders," in the sense of this definition:
Stakeholder – Any person or organization who has an interest in
the actions discussed or is affected by the resulting outcomes of a
project or action. (DOI/USFWS) Revised April 2005 http://www.fws.gov/endangered/glossary.pdf
Herald and News employee Ty Beaver reports in "Water questions
raised: More than 80 people speak at hearing about settlement,"
from the
February 13, 2008
, issue of the
Herald and News: "Stakeholders released the 256-page agreement
document Jan. 15 after two-and-a-half years of negotiation. If approved,
it would allocate water in the
Klamath
River Basin
watershed between irrigators, tribes, fishermen and
conservationists."
As you and I know, "stakeholders" did not release the
draft "agreement." Those involved in the behind-closed-door
approach "represented" a tiny fraction -- perhaps not
even one percent -- of those living in the area that would be
economically devastated.
Beaver's reporting is fatally flawed, but H & N readers will
read and maybe believe, because Beaver was, after all, in attendance.
I've seen this kind of "reporting" before, right here in my
neighborhood when we were fighting for our property rights against
outside forces in the form of U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service and its
73 "partners." It took us almost four years to run them off,
but run them off we did. How did we do it? We never allowed anyone to
try to "achieve consensus" on us. We did not cooperate. We
would not collaborate. We did not capitulate. All the "mays,"
"mights," "coulds," "assurances,"
"agreements," "cooperations," etc., fell upon our
deaf ears, because we knew that what was at stake was our property
rights (which include water, the means to protect our homes, businesses,
custom, culture, economic health, etc.). We never lost sight of what we
were fighting for and we never let anyone sway us from our focus. We
said "NO" over and over. We wrote it, we said it, we had
thousands of signs saying it, and no false information published by
newspapers was allowed to go unchallenged.
Please take my concerns seriously, Bill, John and Al. Although
miles may separate us, I am your neighbor. I care about you, your
families, my friends and family in the Basin, the Klamath pearl, mint,
horseradish, wheat, barley, onions, alfalfa, cattle, sheep, horses, cow
dogs and pets, and what the Klamath Basin will look like in a hundred
years hence. A dear, dear friend says, "And we grow wonderful kids
in our country atmosphere. Don't forget the kids."
What comes of the "agreement" -- other than the nearest
shredder, where I believe it belongs, after having read it several times
-- boils down to the lowest common denominator: the future of property
rights in the Basin, and who controls those rights. The very celebration
of property rights, i.e., freedom, should dictate actions taken
regarding the "agreement" and all other such schemes. As
Klamath County Commissioners, you can help folks or hurt them. The line
you walk is a tightrope, but teetering in the direction of the
"agreement" will hurt property rights in your own backyards
and in mine, as your neighbor. I and many others in
America
keep my eye on your part of the world, because what happens in the
Klamath can happen in the Darby, and vice-versa. What we won here, you
can win there. What we say and do here is history in the making.
Please, therefore, accept and carefully ponder my concerns. They
are being communicated to you in the most sincere manner, from the heart
and soul of me!
I am eager to receive replies from each of you!
Julie Kay Smithson, property rights researcher
propertyrights@earthlink.net
(Permission to post from the author.)
|