December 5, 2008
How long do you have to study
something? PacifiCorp, the federal government and
the states have been studying Klamath dams for
nearly a decade and Klamath Fisheries Task Force
agencies studied the Klamath River for 20 years! If
dam removal waits another 12 years Klamath salmon
runs will likely be all but gone.
This is what happens when you let
the Bush administration and a company owned by
powerful financial interests negotiate a deal behind
closed doors. Now tribes, fishing and environmental
groups which worked for 30 years to clean up the
Klamath and restore salmon are being told they must
accept the deal if they want to get into the room to
negotiate details. They should just say no!
This is the same tactic Bush
administration officials used previously in the
Klamath Water Deal. Then a “framework agreement” had
to be accepted on short notice if a group wanted to
escape the fate of Water Watch and Oregon Wild --
banishment from the “club” of “deciders” -- a
favorite Bush term. Many representatives had not
seen key provisions of that “framework” until a day
or two before the deadline. Language had
mysteriously appeared giving a powerful group of
irrigators priority for Klamath water over fish and
control of key portions of the Upper Klamath Basin.
Groups which balked at the last
minute additions were told these things could be
fixed in the final version. But that never happened.
The same thing is happening now
with the dam deal. To get into the room (and get a
chance to secure a piece of the funding pie) groups
must accept the “Agreement in Principle” negotiated
by PacifiCorp, the Bush administration, and
governors Schwarzenegger and Kulongoski. And most of
the tribes, fishing and environmental groups have
already indicated in press statements that they will
go along. Suddenly PacifiCorp is being praised as
enlightened by the same folks who were sending
protesters to Portland, Oregon, just weeks ago. Like
the irrigation elite before them, PacifiCorp's
investors must be laughing all the way to the bank.
Not only do they get rid of a “toxic asset” and
liability for the crumbling Klamath hydropower
infrastructure (which under the deal will be handed
over to a “dam removal entity”) -- they also get
lots of free money from their electric customers.
As one of those electric customers
I am thankful there is one tribe -- the Hoopa -- and
a few environmental groups -- the Northcoast
Environmental Center, Water Watch and Oregon Wild --
which are not buying either the manipulative tactics
or the corporate-interests-first-and-forever results
of what is now a dam and water deal artificially
joined together.
Let's stand behind the one tribe
that won't give in to the pressure -- the Hoopa --
and the environmental groups which have been
fighting for the Klamath River for three decades.
Let Congressman Mike Thompson and the California
Public Utilities Commission know that we want to
restore the Klamath River and Klamath salmon, not
just remove PacifiCorp's toxic asset at taxpayer and
customer expense.
In a fair settlement the feds,
states and PacifiCorp would share funding dam and
powerhouse removal. In a fair settlement fish will
get the water they need and the irrigation elite
will not come before salmon and small farmers. We
need a fair Klamath settlement not another Bush
corporate giveaway.
Felice Pace has lived in the
Klamath River Basin since 1975. He has been active
on Klamath River issues since 1985. Felice currently
blogs on Klamath issues at
http://KlamBlog.blogspot.com.
He can be reached at
unofelice@hotmail.com.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section
107, any copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or
payment to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this
information for non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more
information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
Source:
http://www.times-standard.com/othervoices/ci_11145362