|
Feds demand little more than status quo on troubled river
Pulling out two dams could significantly improve conditions for
salmon on the Klamath River, according to an analysis by federal
energy regulators released Monday. But that's not what they're
recommending.
Instead, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission proposes to
modify dam owner Pacificorp's proposal to operate the Klamath hydro
project for the next 50 years. That would include trapping adult
salmon and moving them above the dams, then capturing young fish and
moving them below the dams, like an artificial migration.
It would also mean possible engineering fixes for the wounded
waterway, such as modifying Iron Gate Dam to send cooler water
downstream, mildly altering flows in areas, and installing devices to
pump air into oxygen-poor water.
The massive draft Environmental Impact Statement was issued before
a ruling from an administrative law judge on federal fish and wildlife
agencies' demands that fish ladders be built over the dams, and that
screens be installed to keep young fish from being killed by turbines.
FERC chose not to fully analyze taking out all four dams that block
many salmon from reaching spawning grounds, something many fishermen,
tribes and conservation groups want. Poor runs of salmon on the
Klamath have long subdued seasons and quotas for river anglers and
commercial and sport fishermen on the West Coast. This year, the
fishery was declared a multimillion-dollar failure.
”What else do you have to do to prove these dams are worthless
that we haven't already done?” said Craig Tucker with the Karuk
Tribe, which lives on the middle Klamath and has seen subsistence
fishing opportunities evaporate.
Tucker said that FERC doesn't have the authority to overstep the
recommendations of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the National
Marine Fisheries Service. Fish ladders and screens could cost $200
million or more, and FERC found that it would be substantially more
expensive than taking out Iron Gate and Copco I dams.
FERC must impose the conditions that the fisheries agencies -- and
the U.S. Bureau of Land Management -- demand.
”They know that at the end of the day, it has to be included in
the license,” said Fish and Wildlife Program Analyst David Diamond.
“They have no discretion whatsoever.”
But those conditions could be affected by the ruling of the
administrative law judge, who is expected to pass down his decision by
the end of the month. Diamond said FERC obviously didn't find it
important to wait for the judge's ruling.
Pacificorp spokesman Dave Kvamme also voiced some concern over the
release of the document before the judge's decision. Pacificorp
disputes the value of habitat between the dams to salmon, and so
objects to the fisheries agencies' requirement for fish ladders. While
the company is still reviewing the analysis, Kvamme said, it is
certain that it will have to make major investments in the project if
it gets a new license.
”The question is are those things going to be effective for
helping fish?” Kvamme said.
But Troy Fletcher, a consultant with the Yurok Tribe, which has
both subsistence and commercial fisheries for salmon on the lower
river, wondered how FERC could leave dam removal out of the equation.
He said it takes only a partial stab at the wide range of problems on
the Klamath.
”FERC's meager reintroduction plan fails to take into
consideration all the species that the agencies' terms and conditions
address, such as spring salmon and lamprey eel,” Fletcher said.
California Resources Agency spokesman Sandy Cooney said the state
remains committed to restoring the Klamath -- something he said is
beyond the scope of FERC or the environmental document.
”What FERC has done here, while it's within its prerogative, is
take the easy way out,” Cooney said.
The California Coastal Conservancy has found that removing the four
lowermost dams on the Klamath is both feasible and affordable, said
program manager Michael Bowen. Worries about how much sediment is
behind the dams, and whether the muck contains toxins, have been eased
under the conservancy's determination, he said.
”It's like the Western world is trying to restore Klamath salmon,
and all that FERC and Pacificorp can come up with is a Jacuzzi and a
spruced-up campground,” Bowen said.
|