For those considering the green
revolution and wondering about its future, it may be too late. One
prominent authority believes green has gone, gone wild.
M.
David Stirling, vice president of the highly regarded
Pacific Legal Foundation in Sacramento, has just published a
book titled "Green Gone Wild: Elevating Nature Above Human
Rights." In it he catalogs the unrestrained steps by
hardcore environmentalists from Rachel Carson to present-day
power- and property-grabbers who operate through the
implementation and enforcement of the Endangered Species
Act.
He chronicles the half-century
worldwide influence of Carson's rage against the use of the
mosquito-killing DDT as costing tens of millions of lives.
Uncontrolled mosquito populations, especially in developing
countries, have spread killer malarial plagues year after year since
DDT was banned in 1972.
In what Stirling calls a display
of classic hypocrisy, Carson's erroneous fear-mongering that DDT was
causing human sickness and deaths led her radical followers to find
ways to eliminate or curtail humans' activities they viewed as
endangering an ever-expanding number of lesser species. The ESA that
they crafted became the primary vehicle for accomplishing their
mission.
He believes that today's greenies
are on a rampage to confiscate millions of acres of private property
as habitat for an assortment of rats, snakes, crickets, birds,
salamanders and other wildlife and plants. Each declaration of
threatened or endangered status for these creatures implies that
their peril results from the activity and mere existence of humans.
Stirling and his colleagues at PLF
have taken up the cause of human existence and property rights as
guaranteed by the U. S. Constitution in a number of cases in recent
years. Most recently they have declared full-scale legal opposition
to the attempt by green terrorists to declare the polar bear as a
threatened species.
Like many of the other 1,350
species that have been tucked under the ESA's protective canopy,
polar bear numbers are increasing as the animal thrives. Stirling
foresees that tying the polar bear's listing to global warming can
lead to highly restrictive regulation of any human activity viewed
as contributing to that alleged phenomenon.
Stirling's book recalls the poorly
researched science and knee-jerk reaction of authorities to declare
a significant portion of the Northwest's old-growth forests as
protected habitat for the northern spotted owl. Timber operations
throughout the area closed down, causing immeasurable economic and
personal distress to logging families and communities, making the
forests more vulnerable to wildfires.
After several years of disrupting
positively managed forest enterprises, more reasoned research
revealed that a predator owl, not the lack of old-growth trees, was
causing the spotted owl's demise.
Stirling's conclusion is that
nature-loving green zealots hiding behind the ESA are exclusionists
at heart. That means they are anti-human. They believe the earth is
overpopulated, and restrictions on human enterprise such as the
pursuit of happiness should be curtailed, whatever it takes. They
have found a way to discourage and limit human enterprise with the
ESA's onerous and expensive regulations.
He offers 15 ways to modify the
ESA to allow it to actually protect plants and animals that may be
in danger without eliminating human activity and commerce. For
farmers and others with property at stake these suggestions alone
make the book worth the price — $20 in bookstores or by contacting
the Pacific Legal Foundation web site, www.green gonewild.com. The
site contains a direct link to Amazon.com.
Don Curlee is a freelance writer
who specializes in agricultural issues.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any
copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or payment to
those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for
non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more information go
to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml