|







|
Become a friend of
the Klamath Bucket
Brigade
Send
Donations Here
All donations are tax
deductible
|
|
This Website is Dedicated to
Alvin Alexander Cheyne
January
10, 1921 - June 17, 2005
|
|
|

Abstract
of Ground-Water Hydrology of the Upper
Klamath Basin
,
Oregon
and
California
U.S.
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
Scientific Investigations Report 2007–5050
Table
of Contents
Abstract
The upper
Klamath
Basin
spans the California-Oregon
border from the flank of the
Cascade Range
eastward to the Basin and
Range
Province
, and encompasses the
Klamath River
drainage basin above Iron
Gate Dam. Most of the basin is semiarid, but the
Cascade Range
and uplands in the interior and eastern parts of the basin
receive on average more than 30 inches of precipitation per year. The
basin has several perennial streams with mean annual discharges of
hundreds of cubic feet per second, and the
Klamath River
at Iron Gate Dam, which represents drainage from the entire upper
basin, has a mean annual discharge of about 2,100 cubic feet per second.
The basin once contained three large lakes: Upper and
Lower Klamath
Lakes
and
Tule
Lake
, each of which covered
areas of 100 to 150 square miles, including extensive marginal wetlands.
Lower Klamath
Lake
and
Tule
Lake
have been mostly drained,
and the former lake beds are now cultivated.
Upper Klamath Lake
remains, and is an important source of irrigation water.
Much of the wetland surrounding
Upper Klamath Lake
has been diked and drained,
although efforts are underway to restore large areas.
Upper Klamath Lake
and the remaining parts of
Lower Klamath
and
Tule
Lakes
provide important wildlife
habitat, and parts of each are included in the Klamath Basin National
Wildlife Refuges Complex.
The upper
Klamath
Basin
has a substantial regional
ground-water flow system. The late Tertiary to Quaternary volcanic rocks
that underlie the region are generally permeable, with transmissivity
estimates ranging from 1,000 to 100,000 feet squared per day, and
compose a system of variously interconnected aquifers. Interbedded with
the volcanic rocks are late Tertiary sedimentary rocks composed
primarily of fine-grained lake sediments and basin-filling deposits.
These sedimentary deposits have generally low permeability, are not good
aquifers, and probably restrict ground-water movement in some areas. The
regional ground-water system is underlain and bounded on the east and
west by older Tertiary volcanic and sedimentary rocks that have
generally low permeability. Eight regional-scale hydrogeologic units are
defined in the upper
Klamath
Basin
on the basis of surficial geology and subsurface data.
Ground
water flows from recharge areas in the
Cascade Range
and upland areas in the basin interior and eastern margins toward
stream valleys and interior subbasins. Ground water discharge to streams
throughout the basin, and most streams have some component of ground
water (baseflow). Some streams, however, are predominantly ground-water
fed and have relatively constant flows throughout the year. Large
amounts of ground water discharges in the
Wood
River
subbasin, the lower
Williamson
River
area, and along the margin
of the
Cascade Range
. Much of the inflow to
Upper Klamath Lake
can be attributed to
ground-water discharge to streams and major spring complexes within a
dozen or so miles from the lake. This large component of ground water
buffers the lake somewhat from climate cycles. There are also
ground-water discharge areas in the eastern parts of the basin, for
example in the upper Williamson and
Sprague
River
subbasins and in the
Lost
River
subbasin at Bonanza
Springs.
Irrigated
agriculture is an integral part of the economy of the upper
Klamath
Basin
. Although estimates vary
somewhat, roughly 500,000 acres are irrigated in the upper Klamath
Basin, about 190,000 acres of which are part of the Bureau of
Reclamation Klamath Project. Most of this land is irrigated with surface
water. Ground water has been used for many decades to irrigate areas
where surface water is not available, for example outside of irrigation
districts and stream valleys. Ground water has also been used as a
supplemental source of water in areas where surface water supplies are
limited and during droughts. Ground water use for irrigation has
increased in recent years due to drought and shifts in surface-water
allocation from irrigation to instream uses. The shifts in surface-water
allocation have resulted from efforts to improve habitat for fish listed
under the Federal Endangered Species Act.
The
ground-water system in the upper
Klamath
Basin
responds to external stresses such as climate cycles,
pumping, lake stage variations, and canal operation. This response is
manifest as fluctuations in hydraulic head (as represented by
fluctuations in the water-table surface) and variations in ground-water
discharge to springs. Basinwide, decadal-scale climate cycles are the
largest factor controlling head and discharge fluctuations.
Climate-driven water-table fluctuations of more than 12 feet have been
observed near the
Cascade Range
, and decadal-scale
fluctuations of 5 feet are common throughout the basin. Ground-water
discharge to springs and streams varies basinwide in response to
decadal-scale climate cycles.
The
response of the ground-water system to pumping is generally largest in
areas where pumping occurs. Annual drawdown and recovery cycles of 1 to
10 feet are common in pumping areas. Long-term drawdown effects, where
the water table has reached or is attempting to reach a new level in
equilibrium with the pumping, are apparent in parts of the basin.
Since
2001, ground-water use in the upper
Klamath
Basin
has increased by about 50
percent. Much of this increase has occurred in the area in and around
the Bureau of Reclamation Klamath Project, roughly tripling ground-water
pumping in that area. This focused increase in pumping has resulted in
ground-water level declines in the pumped aquifer in excess of 10 to 15
feet over a large part of the Project between 2001 and 2004. If pumping
rates of recent years are continued, the aquifer could achieve a new
equilibrium; however, the final configuration of the water table (depth
to water) and the spatial and temporal distribution of the resulting
effects to streams are unknown. Historical water-level data suggest that
the water table should recover from recent declines if pumping is
reduced to pre-2001 rates.
For
Index to full report http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2007/5050/
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those
who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for
non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more information go
to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
Source: http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2007/5050/section1.html
|