
Background
and Talking Points On
Oregon
House Bill 2566
Here
is another terrible ground water bill that Rep. Dingfelder is trying to
get into a hearing this week with the Ways and Means Committee. I have
included all of the pertinent information and the ramifications of the
bill. We all need to call or e-mail Senator Kurt Schrader (Ways
and Means Committee) and ask him not to schedule a hearing on this bill.
Gail Whitsett
HB 2566 – BILL
TO LIMIT RURAL
DOMESTIC WATER
USERS
PLEASE
e-mail or call Senator Kurt Schrader today and
ask him not to schedule more hearings
on this issue.
E-mail: sen.kurtschrader@state.or.us
tel.#
(503) 986-1720
Background:
This is an extremely controversial piece of legislation and would
only serve to increase the rural and urban divide.
This legislation was introduced as a committee bill by Rep.
Dingfelder. The bill lacks
consensus and severely divides the regulated and non regulated
community.
Some members of the
House Energy and Environment Committee introduced an amendment to remove
all the language in the bill and replace it with the formation of a task
force. Due to a procedural
error, instead of removing language from the bill it was enlarged,
keeping the existing language and making an additional requirement for
the establishment of a task force.
Talking
Points
CHANGES ARE NOT NEEDED
HB 2566 makes completely unnecessary changes to
Oregon
law. Oregon Water
Resources Department currently possesses all statutory and
regulatory tools necessary to protect
Oregon
's aquifers when needed.
ACT CREATES USER FEE
HB 2566 creates a one time $250 user fee for all wells logged after
the effective date of the act to be used to conduct groundwater studies
and monitoring, and to pay for the Department’s costs of permitting
all exempt uses in certain areas.
HB 2566 unfairly forces
exempt domestic well owners to pay a $250 fee that does not apply to
other well owners.
HB 2566 generates a large
amount of money for the Water Resources Department and provides few
restrictions on how the agency must spend it.
The fee imposed on domestic well owners by HB 2566 will generate
about $1 million per year- if not more.
HB 2566 states this money may be used for “ground water
studies”, “ground water monitoring” and to classify ground water
limited and critical ground water areas. This language is very broad and
essentially provides the Department $1 million that may be spent in an
exceedingly discretionary manner.
TAKES
EXISING WATER RIGHTS
“Exempt
water rights” are vested property rights – Exempt water rights, once
established, have the same legal status as any other water right. ORS
537-5452 provides “The use of ground water for a use exempt under subsection (1) of
this section, to the extent that it is beneficial, constitutes a right
to appropriate ground water equal to that established by a ground
water right certificate issued under ORS 537.700.
HB
2566 will divest landowners of vested exempt water rights and
spawn unnecessary
litigation. In
the rush to pass the bill out of committee
before
the deadline, the committee adopted
a bill that retroactively limits vested
exempt water rights, and even allows the Commission to
invalidate vested
exempt water rights in some instances.
The limitation and invalidation of vested
exempt water rights may be deemed a taking of private
property under state
and/or federal taking law.
ACT EXPANDS PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS
Areas that would require a permit for all exempt use upon passage
of the act would include critical groundwater areas, ground water
limited areas, and areas where the highest and best use has been
reclassified by the Department. Reclassification
for highest and best use could include a variety of uses in any stream
including in-stream flow or fish habitat enhancements related to
drought, water temperature, or maintenance of stream morphology.
OWRD BUDGET ALREADY
INCREASED 20% PLUS ADDITIONAL FEES
The department’s new budget increases
fees across the board. Now
the
Department wants a new
fee to conduct unspecified “ground water studies”
and to fund “ground water
monitoring.” Moreover, the Department’s budget
includes an approximate 20% increase in general fund dollars.
When is
enough, enough.
|