March 01, 2004
Contact: Russ Brooks
Phone: (425) 576-0484
Alsea Valley Alliance v. Evans. On February 24, PLF’s Northwest
Center won a key victory
in its ongoing assault on the federal bureaucracy’s reliance on “junk
science” to promote political agendas through the Endangered Species Act.
Rather than appeal the District Court’s decision, NMFS chose to comply with the court’s order and instituted status reviews of salmon and steelhead listed under the ESA across the western states, from Seattle to San Diego and east to Boise. However, several environmental activist groups that intervened in the case appealed Hogan’s decision to the Ninth Circuit. In a long-awaited ruling, the federal appeals court dismissed their appeal reasoning that the environmentalists could participate like any other concerned individuals in the public process related to the status reviews.
The
biggest impact of the decision is that it reinstates the District Court’s
order invalidating and setting aside the bogus “wild” coho salmon listing,
which had been postponed during the appeal. Consequently, the Oregon Coast coho
listing no longer exists and may not be enforced. This PLF victory stands to
have huge implications for land stewards and natural resource providers—such
as farmers, ranchers, and timber harvesters—as well as local governments and
citizens struggling with infrastructure development of schools, hospitals, and
highways.
Source: http://www.pacificlegal.org/view_PublicationDetail.asp?iID=229&dt=March 01, 2004&sTitle=Bogus+Endangered+Species+Act+Protections+for+%93Wild%94+Coho+
Salmon+Must+Go&iParentID=5
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml