By Gary Nabhan, director
Center
for Sustainable Environments
Northern Arizona University
Whenever it has rained or snowed
in the West this winter, ranchers and farmers have wondered whether the new
moisture has been significant enough to break the drought and get their
operations back to a normal business routine.
But the sad truth is that there is no "normal" condition in much of
the arid West; we spend most of our time either in drought or recovering from
it. And regardless of when the meteorological drought is finally broken, it will
be many more years, if ever, that farms and ranches will be able to recover from
what we might call hydrological and economic droughts. Reservoirs will take
years to refill, and the food economy is fraught will instability.
Although this view may sound rather gloomy or cynical, a review of the
consequences of the droughts in the 1930s and '50s bears me out. Range-fed sheep
and cattle stocking rates never returned to what they were prior to those
droughts. Because there were crop failures of dry-farmed grains and beans, many
farms went belly-up in the Dust Bowl and never relied on rain alone again.
Still, two factors make this drought different than those in the '30s and '50s.
First, today's farmers are not suffering crop failures as much as they are
suffering from higher production costs that now keep them in debt. Rather than
seeing their crops dry up because rains are sparse and reservoir levels are
down, they are investing more in buying and transporting water, controlling
pests and maintaining costly irrigation systems.
Since the drought began in 1997, Arizona farmers and ranchers have shouldered 22
percent more debt than they did before. Such debt has forced many out of
business, so that we've been losing an average of 100 farms and ranches in
Arizona since the drought began, opposed to the long-term average of 82 lost per
year.
But the second, unparalleled factor at work today is much more insidious.
Government policies on water allocation during drought have put farmers,
ranchers and the food security they offer us at a selective disadvantage,
whereas water-consumptive urban growth has continued unchecked.
During the past two years, when farmers in the Metro Phoenix area have been
forced to cut back their irrigation by 30 percent, urban users have barely
diminished their water use by 5 percent, and most of that savings has been due
to the valiant efforts of city park managers to use less water.
Regardless of how much central Arizona farmers cut back on their irrigation
needs, no more water is truly being conserved for wildlife habitats and future
needs because 25,000 more users take up residence in Metro Phoenix every year.
In general, residents of Southwestern cities have increased their per capita use
by one-fourth over the past quarter century, while farmers have reduced per acre
use by one-fifth. Is this fair?
The net effect is that during this drought, more food-producing land has been
sold to shopping mall and subdivision developers than ever before. This is
because there are few policies that assist farmers and ranchers in resisting
urban sprawl. The long-term consequences of such gaps in land and water policy
is that more and more of America's food is coming from off-shore sources. We
have sacrificed some of the most fertile lands in the world to asphalt and
concrete. In doing so, we have compromised our own food security and safety –
few countries regulate pesticides and other contaminants to the extent that the
U.S. does.
As an attempt to counter such devastating trends in the Southwestern states, the
Center for Sustainable Environments is launching a branding campaign to help
farmers and ranchers survive this drought. Their direct-marketed products can be
labeled with tags and stickers urging consumers to "Get Yours Fresh from
Canyon Country."
Nearly half of Arizona's consumers, when surveyed, say that they would be
willing to pay more for such locally produced foods; they are particularly
interested in fresh, good-quality produce and meats grown with water-conserving,
environmentally friendly practices.
If households, restaurants and cafeterias choose to purchase more "Canyon
Country Fresh" products, farmers and ranchers will gain more of each
consumer food dollar, and will perhaps have the means to reduce their debts and
recover from the economic drought.
It is time for Westerners to rally together to ensure that our region's farmers
and ranchers are guaranteed enough water to provide our communities with secure
food supplies. If we don't, we will be increasing our vulnerability to
contaminated vegetables from Mexico and downer cattle from Canada.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those who
have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for
non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml